The benefits and costs of using social distancing to flatten the curve for COVID-19
Open accessAbstract
We examine the net benefits of social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19 in USA. Social distancing saves lives but imposes large costs on society due to reduced economic activity. We use epidemiological and economic forecasting to perform a rapid benefit–cost analysis of controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Assuming that social distancing measures can substantially reduce contacts among individuals, we find net benefits of about $5.2 trillion in our benchmark case. We examine the magnitude of the critical parameters that might imply negative net benefits, including the value of statistical life and the discount rate. A key unknown factor is the speed of economic recovery with and without social distancing measures in place. A series of robustness checks also highlight the key role of the value of mortality risk reductions and discounting in the analysis and point to a need for effective economic stimulus when the outbreak has passed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wu, Z., & McGoogan, J. M. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.2648 · Cited by 17,016 · see citing works
A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics
Kermack, W. O., & McKendrick, A. G. (1927) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0118 · Cited by 12,281 · see citing works
The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases
Hethcote, H. W. (2000) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s0036144500371907 · Cited by 6,717 · see citing works
Lauer, S. A., Grantz, K. H., Bi, Q., Jones, F. K., Zheng, Q., Meredith, H. R., Azman, A. S., Reich, N. G., & Lessler, J. (2020) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m20-0504 · Cited by 5,970 · see citing works
Ferguson, N. M., Laydon, D. J., Nedjati-Gilani, G. L., Imai, N., Ainslie, K. E. C., Baguelin, M., Bhatia, S., Boonyasiri, A., Cucunubá, Z. M., Cuomo-Dannenburg, G., et al. (2020) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25561/77482 · Cited by 3,453 · see citing works
The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus
Liu, Y., Gayle, A. A., Wilder‐Smith, A., & Rocklöv, J. (2020) · Journal of Travel Medicine · doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa021 · Cited by 3,169 · see citing works
Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
Keeling, M. J., & Rohani, P. (2008) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400841035 · Cited by 2,888 · see citing works
Modeling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals
Keeling, M. J., & Rohani, P. (2011) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvcm4gk0 · Cited by 2,882 · see citing works
High Contagiousness and Rapid Spread of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
Sanche, S., Lin, Y. T., Xu, C., Romero-Severson, E., Hengartner, N., & Ke, R. (2020) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid2607.200282 · Cited by 1,619 · see citing works
The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven ScenariosPreprint
McKibbin, W. J., & Fernando, R. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3547729 · Cited by 1,526 · see citing works
Targeted Social Distancing Designs for Pandemic Influenza
Glass, R. J., Glass, L. M., Beyeler, W., & Min, H. J. (2006) · Emerging infectious diseases · doi:10.3201/eid1211.060255 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Adjusting the Value of a Statistical Life for Age and Cohort Effects
Aldy, J. E., & Viscusi, W. K. (2008) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.90.3.573 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Quantifying social distancing arising from pandemic influenza
Caley, P. A., Philp, D. J., & McCracken, K. (2007) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2007.1197 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Very Long-Run Discount Rates *
Giglio, S., Maggiori, M., & Stroebel, J. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju036 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Shepard, D. S., & Zeckhauser, R. (1984) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.4.423 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Controlling epidemic spread by social distancing: Do it well or not at all
Maharaj, S., & Kleczkowski, A. (2012) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-679 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Pricing Lives: Guideposts for a Safer Society
Viscusi, W. K. (2018) · Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · Cited by 124 · see citing works
The Value of a Statistical Life
Kniesner, T. J., & Viscusi, W. K. (2019) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.138 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Life-Cycle Consumption and the Age-Adjusted Value of Life
Kniesner, T., Ziliak, J. P., & Viscusi, W. K. (2004) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w10266 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Do we really understand the age–VSL relationship?
Evans, M. F., & Smith, V. K. (2006) · Resource and Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2006.02.004 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Life-Cycle Consumption and the Age-Adjusted Value of Life
Kniesner, T. J., Viscusi, W. K., & Ziliak, J. P. (2006) · The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy · doi:10.1515/1538-0645.1524 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Critical immune and vaccination thresholds for determining multiple influenza epidemic waves
Matrajt, L., & Longini, I. M. (2011) · Epidemics · doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2011.11.003 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Greenstone, M., and Nigam, V. 2020 Does Social Distancing Matter? University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, Working Paper No. 2020-26. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561244. (accessed April 3, 2020).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Mututwa, W., & Matsilele, T. (2020) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.19050209 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thunström, L., Newbold, S. C., Finnoff, D., Ashworth, M., & Shogren, J. F.
- Affiliations
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Corresponding author
- Thunström, Linda
- Newbold, Stephen C.
- Venue
- Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 179-195
- ISSN
- 2152-2812 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-5888
- PMC
- PMC7242774
- OpenAlex
- W3013647582
- Cited by
- 439
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 88
- FWCI
- 81.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, cost-benefit analysis, epidemic control, economic costs of lockdown, value of a statistical life, discount rate, economic recovery, economic stimulus, mortality risk reduction, contact reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review