Cited by 439COVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

The benefits and costs of using social distancing to flatten the curve for COVID-19

Open access
Thunström, Linda, Newbold, Stephen C., Finnoff, David, Ashworth, Madison, Shogren, Jason F.·2020·Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis

Abstract

We examine the net benefits of social distancing to slow the spread of COVID-19 in USA. Social distancing saves lives but imposes large costs on society due to reduced economic activity. We use epidemiological and economic forecasting to perform a rapid benefit–cost analysis of controlling the COVID-19 outbreak. Assuming that social distancing measures can substantially reduce contacts among individuals, we find net benefits of about $5.2 trillion in our benchmark case. We examine the magnitude of the critical parameters that might imply negative net benefits, including the value of statistical life and the discount rate. A key unknown factor is the speed of economic recovery with and without social distancing measures in place. A series of robustness checks also highlight the key role of the value of mortality risk reductions and discounting in the analysis and point to a need for effective economic stimulus when the outbreak has passed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/bca.2020.12

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Greenstone, M., and Nigam, V. 2020 Does Social Distancing Matter? University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, Working Paper No. 2020-26. Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3561244. (accessed April 3, 2020).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thunström, L., Newbold, S. C., Finnoff, D., Ashworth, M., & Shogren, J. F.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
  • Thunström, Linda
  • Newbold, Stephen C.
Venue
Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis
Published
2020
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
179-195
ISSN
  • 2152-2812 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-5888
OpenAlex
W3013647582
Cited by
439
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 88
FWCI
81.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, cost-benefit analysis, epidemic control, economic costs of lockdown, value of a statistical life, discount rate, economic recovery, economic stimulus, mortality risk reduction, contact reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review