The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Covid-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal among Canadian healthcare workers: A multicenter survey
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers (HCW) remains poorly understood. We assessed HCWs' willingness to be vaccinated and reasons underlying hesitancy. METHODS: Cross-sectional survey across 17 healthcare institutions. HCWs eligible for vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA) in December 2020 were invited to receive immunization. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of acceptance. Reasons for refusal among those who never intended to be vaccinated (ie, firm refusers) and those who preferred delaying vaccination (ie, vaccine hesitants) were assessed. RESULTS: Among 2,761 respondents (72% female, average age, 44), 2,233 (80.9%) accepted the vaccine. Physicians, environmental services workers and healthcare managers were more likely to accept vaccination compared to nurses. Male sex, age over 50, rehabilitation center workers, and occupational COVID-19 exposure were independently associated with vaccine acceptance by multivariate analysis. Factors for refusal included vaccine novelty, wanting others to receive it first, and insufficient time for decision-making. Among those who declined, 74% reported they may accept future vaccination. Vaccine firm refusers were more likely than vaccine hesitants to distrust pharmaceutical companies and to prefer developing a natural immunity by getting COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine hesitancy exists among HCWs. Our findings provide useful information to plan future interventions and improve acceptance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diffusion of innovations: Some examples of finnish civil servant's professional tours in Europe
Hietala, M. (1983) · Scandinavian Journal of History · doi:10.1080/03468758308579015 · Cited by 6,162
Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants
MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036 · Cited by 5,573
WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard
(2020) · Bangladesh Physiotherapy Journal · doi:10.46945/bpj.10.1.03.01 · Cited by 3,806
Vaccine hesitancy: An overview
Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., & Bettinger, J. A. (2013) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.4161/hv.24657 · Cited by 2,172
Betsch, C., Schmid, P., Heinemeier, D., Korn, L., Holtmann, C., & Böhm, R. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208601 · Cited by 1,282
Increasing Vaccination: Putting Psychological Science Into Action
Brewer, N. T., Chapman, G. B., Rothman, A. J., Leask, J., & Kempe, A. (2017) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618760521 · Cited by 1,233
Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Eccles, M., & Grimshaw, J. (2008) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-3-36 · Cited by 1,096
Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review
Yaqub, O., Castle-Clarke, S., Sevdalis, N., & Chataway, J. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.018 · Cited by 1,089
Factors associated with uptake of vaccination against pandemic influenza: A systematic review
Bish, A., Yardley, L., Nicoll, A., & Michie, S. (2011) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.06.107 · Cited by 685
Kwok, K. O., Li, K.-K., WEI, W. I., Tang, A., Wong, S. Y. S., & Lee, S. S. (2021) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103854 · Cited by 673
Cited by
Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W. (2021) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113 · Cited by 396
Lavoie, K., Gosselin-Boucher, V., Stojanovic, J., Gupta, S., Gagné, M., Joyal-Desmarais, K., Séguin, K., Gorin, S. S., Ribeiro, P., Voisard, B., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059411 · Cited by 59
Royal society of Canada COVID-19 report: Enhancing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Canada
MacDonald, N. E., Comeau, J., Dubé, È., Graham, J., Greenwood, M., Harmon, S., McElhaney, J., Meghan McMurtry, C., Middleton, A., Steenbeek, A., et al. (2021) · FACETS · doi:10.1139/facets-2021-0037 · Cited by 42
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dzieciolowska, S., Hamel, D., Gadio, S., Dionne, M., Gagnon, D., Robitaille, L., Cook, E., Caron, I., Talib, A., Parkes, L., Dubé, È., & Longtin, Y.
- Venue
- American Journal of Infection Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1152-1157
- ISSN
- 0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159141125
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 31.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Covid-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal among Canadian healthcare workers: A multicenter survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.079
- The paper
- Dzieciolowska, S., Hamel, D., Gadio, S., Dionne, M., Gagnon, D., Robitaille, L., Cook, E., Caron, I., Talib, A., Parkes, L., Dubé, È., & Longtin, Y. (2021). Covid-19 vaccine acceptance, hesitancy, and refusal among Canadian healthcare workers: A multicenter survey. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2021.04.079
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.