Cited by 37Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMedicine, History, and PhilosophyMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The beliefs and attitudes of UK registered osteopaths towards chronic pain and the management of chronic pain sufferers-A cross-sectional questionnaire based survey

Open access
Macdonald, M., Vaucher, Paul, Esteves, Jorge E.·2018·International journal of osteopathic medicine

Abstract

Objectives This study investigated the beliefs and attitudes of UK registered osteopaths towards chronic pain and the management of chronic pain sufferers. Methods A cross-sectional questionnaire based survey of UK registered osteopaths was performed to test the hypothesis that osteopaths have a more biopsychosocial approach to treating and managing chronic pain patients than other healthcare professionals. Sociodemographic determinants of the participants were explored and the original HC-PAIRS and the PABS-PT used as measurement tools. They assess practitioners' attitudes and beliefs towards perceived harmfulness of physical activities for patients with cLBP and participants' knowledge of pain. International meta-analyses were performed with both measurement tools to allow comparison with other healthcare professionals. Results UK registered osteopaths (n = 216) had mean PABS-PT subscale scores of 31.37 ± 6.26 [CI95% 30.53–32.21] (biomedical) and 32.72 ± 4.29 [CI95% 32.14–33.29] (biopsychosocial). The mean HC-PAIRS total score was 45.45 ± 10.05 [CI95% 44.11–46.8]. These indicate a wide spread of beliefs and knowledge towards chronic pain with a tendency to agree that physical activity is not necessarily harmful for patients with cLBP. Post-graduate education had a significant positive effect on questionnaire results. Meta-analyses revealed that UK registered osteopaths have significantly better HC-PAIRS scores than most physiotherapy students, nurses and pharmacists, and had similar PABS-PT scores to most other healthcare professionals. Conclusions The hypothesis of UK registered osteopaths having a more biopsychosocial approach to treating and managing chronic pain patients in comparison to other healthcare providers has been rejected. This seems in contrast to the typically claimed unique concepts of osteopathy. Nevertheless, this study supports their ability to engage with psychosocial factors of the patients' pain experience, but shows that it can be improved. This paper suggests that training is needed to increase osteopaths' expertise in knowledge of chronic pain, and their attitudes towards the management of chronic pain sufferers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijosm.2018.07.003

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Haldeman S. Failure of the pathology model to predict back pain. Spine 1990;15(7):718-24.
  2. Melzac R. Evolution of the neuromatrix theory of pain. Pain Pract 2005;5:85-94.
  3. Parsons J, Marcer N. Psychological considerations. Osteopathy: models for diag- nosis, treatment and practice. 1st edChina: Elsevier Limited; 2006. p. 137-58.
  4. Domenech J, Sánchez-Zuriaga D, Segura-Orti E, Espejo B, Lison JF. Impact of bio- medical and biopsychosocial educative modules on the attitudes, beliefs and re- commendations of health care providers about low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Eur Spine J 2011;20(4):S438.
  5. Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC. The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria. Organ Res Meth 2006;9(2):202-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Macdonald, M., Vaucher, P., & Esteves, J. E.
Affiliations
  • HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH)
  • Instituto Piaget (PT)
Corresponding author
Macdonald, M.
Venue
International journal of osteopathic medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
30
Pages
3-11
ISSN
1746-0689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884600569
Cited by
37
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International journal of osteopathic medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • ArODES (HES-SO (https://www.hes-so.ch/)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British School of Osteopathy's Research Ethics Committee
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Medicine, History, and Philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
osteopaths, chronic pain, chronic low back pain, biopsychosocial model, practitioner beliefs, practitioner attitudes, pain knowledge, physical activity, graduate education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review