Cited by 42Hip and Femur FracturesAging, Health, and DisabilityBone health and osteoporosis research

Prevalence of depression in older people with hip fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heidari, Mohammad Eghbal, Naghibi Irvani, Seyed Sina, Dalvand, Pegah, Khadem, Mohaddeseh, Eskandari, Fereshte, Torabi, Fatemeh, Shahsavari, Hooman·2021·International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing

Abstract

Introduction Hip fracture disrupts general health and is one of the most common physical injuries in the elderly. Depression is the most common mood disorder in older people and one of the main complications of hip fractures.Aim and methods We conducted a meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of depression in older people with hip fractures. Relevant literature published until July 2019 was obtained and screened according to established inclusion criteria. Two researchers independently carried out quality assessment and data extraction before the meta-analysis. We calculated proportions with 95% confidence intervals (CI). To investigate the sources of heterogeneity, we performed subgroup analyses based on study design, follow-up duration, type of fracture, and gender.Results Twenty-seven studies with a combined sample size of 11958 were included. The overall prevalence of depression in older people with hip fracture was 23% (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.29). The lowest and highest prevalence of depression was in Asia (0.19) and America (0.27) respectively.Conclusion In this systematic review and meta-analysis the estimated prevalence of depression among older hip fracture patients was 23%. Further research is needed to identify strategies for preventing and treating mood disorders in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100813

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heidari, M. E., Naghibi Irvani, S. S., Dalvand, P., Khadem, M., Eskandari, F., Torabi, F., & Shahsavari, H.
Affiliations
  • Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • University of Shahrood (IR)
Venue
International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
40
Pages
100813
ISSN
1878-1241 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3047808026
Cited by
42
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
depression, hip fracture, older adults, prevalence, mood disorders, fracture complications, gender differences, fracture type
MeSH terms
Aged, Depression, Hip Fractures, Humans, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review