CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies

Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz, Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose, Choi, Tsan-Ming, Latan, Hengky·2022·International Journal of Production Economics
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Adegbesan, 2009, On the origins of competitive advantage: strategic factor markets and heterogeneous resource complementarity, Acad. Manag. Rev., 34, 463, 10.5465/amr.2009.40632465 · DOI
  2. Aguinis, 2018, What you see is what you get? Enhancing methodological transparency in management research, Acad. Manag. Ann., 12, 1, 10.5465/annals.2016.0011 · DOI
  3. Aguinis, 2021, Best practices in data collection and preparation: recommendations for reviewers, editors, and authors, Organ. Res. Methods, 24, 678, 10.1177/1094428119836485 · DOI
  4. Angell, 1999, Integrating environmental issues into the mainstream: an agenda for research in operations management, J. Oper. Manag., 17, 575, 10.1016/S0272-6963(99)00006-6 · DOI
  5. Battini, 2017, Closed loop supply chain (CLSC): economics, modelling, management and control, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 183, 319, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.020 · DOI
  6. Bedeian, 2014, More than meets the eye”: a guide to interpreting the descriptive statistics and correlation matrices reported in management research, Acad. Manag. Learn. Educ., 13, 121, 10.5465/amle.2013.0001 · DOI
  7. Bernerth, 2018, Control variables in leadership research: a qualitative and quantitative review, J. Manag., 44, 131
  8. Black, 1994, Strategic resources: traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage, Strat. Manag. J., 15, 131, 10.1002/smj.4250151009 · DOI
  9. Bocken, 2016, Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy, J. Industrial Production Eng., 33, 308, 10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bozionelos, 2022, Methodological threat or myth? Evaluating the current state of evidence on common method variance in human resource management research, Hum. Resour. Manag. J., 32, 194, 10.1111/1748-8583.12398 · DOI
  11. Braccini, 2019, Exploring organizational sustainability of Industry 4.0 under the triple bottom line: the case of a manufacturing company, Sustainability, 11, 36, 10.3390/su11010036 · DOI
  12. Bressanelli, 2018, Exploring how usage-focused business models enable circular economy through digital technologies, Sustainability, 10, 639, 10.3390/su10030639 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Brix-Asala, 2020, Bridging institutional voids via supplier development in base of the pyramid supply chains, Prod. Plann. Control, 31, 903, 10.1080/09537287.2019.1695918 · DOI
  14. Buer, 2020, The complementary effect of lean manufacturing and digitalisation on operational performance, Int. J. Prod. Res., 1
  15. Cagliano, 2019, The interplay between smart manufacturing technologies and work organization, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 39, 913, 10.1108/IJOPM-01-2019-0093 · DOI
  16. Chen, 2015, Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability implications, J. Clean. Prod., 107, 615, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.009 · DOI
  17. Choi, 2022, Disruptive technologies and operations management in the Industry 4.0 era and beyond, Prod. Oper. Manag., 10.1111/poms.13622 · DOI
  18. Choi, 2022, OR and analytics for digital, resilient, and sustainable manufacturing 4.0, Ann. Oper. Res., 10.1007/s10479-022-04536-3 · DOI
  19. Colquitt, 2007, Trends in theory building and theory testing: a five-decade study of the Academy of Management Journal, Acad. Manag. J., 50, 1281, 10.5465/amj.2007.28165855 · DOI
  20. Corsini, 2019, Exploring the antecedents and consequences of environmental performance in micro-enterprises: the case of the Italian craft beer industry, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 138, 340, 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.018 · DOI
  21. Da Silva, 2020, Implementation of Industry 4.0 concept in companies: empirical evidences, Int. J. Comput. Integrated Manuf., 33, 325, 10.1080/0951192X.2019.1699258 · DOI
  22. Dai, 2017, Examining corporate environmental proactivity and operational performance: a strategy-structure-capabilities-performance perspective within a green context, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 193, 272, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.023 · DOI
  23. Dalenogare, 2018, The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 204, 383, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2017, Uma economia circular no Brasil: uma exploratória inicial. 2017
  25. Ennen, 2010, The whole is more than the sum of its parts—or is it? A review of the empirical literature on complementarities in organizations, J. Manag., 36, 207
  26. Ferrando, 2009, General factor-analytic procedure for assessing response bias in questionnaire measures, Struct. Equ. Model.: A Multidiscip. J., 16, 364, 10.1080/10705510902751374 · DOI
  27. Flynn, 2010, The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach, J. Oper. Manag., 28, 58, 10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Fulton, 2018, Organizations and survey research: implementing response enhancing strategies and conducting nonresponse analyses, Socio. Methods Res., 47, 240, 10.1177/0049124115626169 · DOI
  29. Furlan, 2011, Complementarity and lean manufacturing bundles: an empirical analysis, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 31, 835, 10.1108/01443571111153067 · DOI
  30. Genovese, 2021, The circular economy at a crossroads: technocratic eco-modernism or convivial technology for social revolution?, Appl. Econ. Lett., 32, 95
  31. Genovese, 2017, Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications, Omega, 66, 344, 10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015 · DOI
  32. Govindan, 2018, A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56, 278, 10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 · DOI
  33. Govindan, 2020, Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: a meta-analysis of the literature, Transport. Res. E Logist. Transport. Rev., 137, 10.1016/j.tre.2020.101923 · DOI
  34. Hair, 2019, Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares, Eur. J. Market., 53, 566, 10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Hair, 2021, Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: updates for family business researchers, J. Family Business Strategy, 12, 10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100392 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hitt, 2016, Resource based theory in operations management research, J. Oper. Manag., 41, 77, 10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.002 · DOI
  37. Holtom, 2022, Survey response rates: Trends and a validity assessment framework, Human Relations, 75, 1560, 10.1177/00187267211070769 · DOI
  38. Hong, 2019, Complementarity of performance pay and task allocation, Manag. Sci., 65, 4951
  39. Inigo, 2019, Strengthening the socio-ethical foundations of the circular economy: lessons from responsible research and innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 233, 280, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.053 · DOI
  40. Kalnins, 2018, Multicollinearity: how common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression, Strat. Manag. J., 39, 2362, 10.1002/smj.2783 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Ketokivi, 2017, Addressing the endogeneity dilemma in operations management research: theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic considerations, J. Oper. Manag., 52, 1, 10.1016/j.jom.2017.05.001 · DOI
  42. Kirchherr, 2018, Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU), Ecol. Econ., 150, 264, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kock, 2018, Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods, Inf. Syst. J., 28, 227, 10.1111/isj.12131 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy: the concept and its limitations, Ecol. Econ., 143, 37, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Korhonen, 2018, Circular economy as an essentially contested concept, J. Clean. Prod., 175, 544, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Kovacs, 2018, The dark corners of Industry 4.0–Grounding economic governance 2.0, Technol. Soc., 55, 140, 10.1016/j.techsoc.2018.07.009 · DOI
  47. Lowe, 2022, What theories of value (could) underpin our circular futures?, Ecol. Econ., 195, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107382 · DOI
  48. Millar, 2019, The circular economy: swings and roundabouts?, Ecol. Econ., 158, 11, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012 · DOI
  49. Nascimento, 2019, Exploring Industry 4.0 technologies to enable circular economy practices in a manufacturing context: a business model proposal, J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., 30, 607, 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0071 · DOI
  50. 2016, Industry 4.0: a new challenge for Brazilian industry. CNI, Indicators, 17, 1
  51. 2019, Pesquisa sobre economia circular na indústria brasileira
  52. Nielsen, 2018, The performance effects of complementary management control mechanisms, Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 38, 2124, 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2016-0577 · DOI
  53. Paulraj, 2011, Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability, J. Supply Chain Manag., 47, 19, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03212.x · DOI · Paper page
  54. Porter, 1995, Green and competitive: ending the stalemate, Harv. Bus. Rev., 73, 120
  55. Rajput, 2019, Connecting circular economy and Industry 4.0, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 49, 98
  56. Ramli, 2019, Determinants of capital structure and firm financial performance—a PLS-SEM approach: evidence from Malaysia and Indonesia, Q. Rev. Econ. Finance, 71, 148, 10.1016/j.qref.2018.07.001 · DOI
  57. Rattalino, 2018, Circular advantage anyone? Sustainability‐driven innovation and circularity at Patagonia, Inc, Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev., 60, 747, 10.1002/tie.21917 · DOI
  58. Roemer, 2021, HTMT2–an improved criterion for assessing discriminant validity in structural equation modeling, Ind. Manag. Data Syst., 121, 2637, 10.1108/IMDS-02-2021-0082 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Rosa, 2020, Assessing relations between Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Prod. Res., 58, 1662, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1680896 · DOI
  60. Roxas, 2012, Social desirability bias in survey research on sustainable development in small firms: an exploratory analysis of survey mode effect, Bus. Strat. Environ., 21, 223, 10.1002/bse.730 · DOI
  61. Sarc, 2019, Digitalization and intelligent robotics in value chain of circular economy-oriented waste management–A review, Waste Manag., 95, 476, 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.06.035 · DOI
  62. Schröder, 2019, Degrowth within–Aligning circular economy and strong sustainability narratives, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 146, 190, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.038 · DOI
  63. Schroeder, 2019, The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals, J. Ind. Ecol., 23, 77, 10.1111/jiec.12732 · DOI
  64. Soda, 2017, Bringing tasks back in: an organizational theory of resource complementarity and partner selection, J. Manag., 43, 348
  65. Spector, 2021, Mastering the use of control variables: the hierarchical iterative control (HIC) approach, J. Bus. Psychol., 36, 737, 10.1007/s10869-020-09709-0 · DOI
  66. Teece, 1986, Firm boundaries, technological innovation, and strategic management, Econ. Strategic Plann., 187
  67. Tortorella, 2018, Implementation of Industry 4.0 and lean production in Brazilian manufacturing companies, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56, 2975, 10.1080/00207543.2017.1391420 · DOI
  68. Ullah, 2021, How to use instrumental variables in addressing endogeneity? A step-by-step procedure for non-specialists, Ind. Market. Manag., 96, A1, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.03.006 · DOI
  69. 2019, Responsible Consumpt. Product.: why it matters
  70. World Economic Forum, 2018, Readiness Future Product. Rep. 2018
  71. Xu, 2018, Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends, Int. J. Prod. Res., 56, 2941, 10.1080/00207543.2018.1444806 · DOI
  72. Yang, 2019, Complementarity of circular economy practices: an empirical analysis of Chinese manufacturers, Int. J. Prod. Res., 57, 6369, 10.1080/00207543.2019.1566664 · DOI
  73. Zink, 2017, Circular economy rebound, J. Ind. Ecol., 21, 593, 10.1111/jiec.12545 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Metadata

Authors
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Choi, T.-M., & Latan, H.
ORCID
Venue
International Journal of Production Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
252
Pages
108581
ISSN
0925-5273
DOI
10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581
Cited by
122
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581
The paper
Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, A. B., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., Choi, T.-M., & Latan, H. (2022). ‘Better together’: Evidence on the joint adoption of circular economy and industry 4.0 technologies. International Journal of Production Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108581