Cited by 12Ear Surgery and Otitis MediaHearing Loss and RehabilitationHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics

Annual hearing screening in girls with Turner syndrome: results from the first three years in Glasgow

Kubba, Haytham, McAllister, Kerrie, Hunter, Karen, Mason, Avril·2019·International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Abstract

Background Hearing loss is prevalent in girls with Turner Syndrome (TS). A number of cross-sectional studies have confirmed that conductive hearing loss due to middle ear disease and permanent, progressive sensorineural hearing loss are both very common and often unrecognised in TS. Hearing screening has been suggested by many authors and is recommended in some recent national audiology guidelines (every 3-5 years in an international consensus statement, every 1-2 years in the USA and every year in the UK). The effectiveness of such regular hearing screening has not been assessed before.Study aims and methods In January 2016 we began a programme of annual hearing screening for all girls attending the West of Scotland TS clinic. We have collected data on age, karyotype, ear and hearing symptoms, otoscopy findings, audiometric test results and subsequent outcomes for the first three years of our programme. Our aim is to assess whether this screening programme is an effective use of resources, with a worthwhile rate of detecting new otological problems and without an excessive additional workload for the audiology department.Results Twenty-six girls participated in the screening programme and 8 of these had no hearing issues or ear abnormalities at any time over the 3 years. Two girls had cholesteatoma, 4 had tympanic membrane retractions and/or perforations, and 9 had OME (of which 6 were transient and 3 persistent, with 2 of these requiring treatment). One cholesteatoma, one perforation and one persistent OME were already known about but all other diagnoses were new as a result of the screening programme. Five girls have persistent conductive hearing loss (plus another 6 who had a transient episode of conductive loss due to middle ear fluid) and 6 have some degree of sensorineural hearing loss (3 purely sensorineural, 3 mixed). At the time that a hearing loss was diagnosed, the parents had concerns about the hearing in 4 cases and no concerns in 12. Six girls have been fitted with hearing aids since we started the screening programme, each for different indications (sensorineural hearing loss in two cases, and one case each of persistent OME, post cholesteatoma surgery, tympanic membrane perforation and unilateral tympanic membrane retraction respectively). Two girls have had ear surgery as a result of referral from the programme (one for ventilation tubes, one for cholesteatoma).Conclusions The screening programme has picked up ear disease in 69% of girls with TS with only a small additional workload for the audiology department. The ongoing detection of new problems in the second and third years of the programme attests to the value of continued regular hearing screening for girls with TS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.02.025

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 75% of children with TS identified to have hearing loss reported no concerns prior to screening.

    “While adults can often self-identify a decline in hearing ability, 75% of children with TS identified to have hearing loss reported no concerns prior to screening.652”
  • Middle ear fluid is often accompanied with conductive hearing loss that is not clinically recognized, particularly in infants and young children with TS.

    “Furthermore, middle ear fluid is often accompanied with conductive hearing loss that is not clinically recognized, particularly in infants and young children.652”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubba, H., McAllister, K., Hunter, K., & Mason, A.
Affiliations
Royal Hospital for Children (GB)
Corresponding author
Kubba, Haytham
Venue
International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
120
Pages
152-156
ISSN
0165-5876 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2911760237
Cited by
12
References
22
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Keywords
Turner syndrome, hearing screening, conductive hearing loss, sensorineural hearing loss, otitis media with effusion, cholesteatoma, tympanic membrane perforation, middle ear disease, hearing aids, screening effectiveness, girls, audiometric outcomes, tympanostomy tubes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Audiometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hearing Loss, Conductive, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Infant, Mass Screening, Scotland, Turner Syndrome, Tympanic Membrane Perforation, Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear, Otoscopy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review