The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Projects to create the future: Managing projects meets sustainable development
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To reduce the impact on nature and to keep costs down, circular material use was at the forefront of the design, as seen by Huemann and Silvius (2017).”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Huemann and Silvius, 2017
In the citing paper
“Overall, there is a gap in understanding how projects can contribute to the necessary sustainable transition in society (Winch, 2022), specifically through leadership, focusing on both the sustainability practices in a project and sustainability by projects (Huemann and Silvius, 2017).”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Huemann and Silvius, 2017
In the citing paper
“The findings contribute by suggesting circularity as a valuable approach for projects aiming to combine sustainability of the projects and sustainability by the projects, see Huemann and Silvius (2017) and Magano et al. (2021).”
From Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance (2025) · cites this paper as Huemann and Silvius (2017)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Aarseth, 2017, Project sustainability strategies: a systematic literature review, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1071, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.11.006 · DOI
- Eskerod, 2013, Sustainable development and project stakeholder management: what standards say, Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus., 6, 36, 10.1108/17538371311291017 · DOI
- Hueskes, 2017, Governing Public–Private Partnerships for Sustainability. An Analysis of Procurement and Governance Practices of PPP Infrastructure Projects, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1184, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.020 · DOI
- Kazlauskas, 2009, Web 2.0 solutions to wicked climate change problems, Aust. J. Inf. Syst., 16
- Keeys, 2017, Project Benefits Co-creation: Shaping Sustainable Development Benefits, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1196, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.008 · DOI · Paper page
- Labuschagne, 2005, Sustainable project life cycle management: the need to integrate life cycles in the manufacturing sector, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 23, 159, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.06.003 · DOI
- Lundin, 1995, A theory of the temporary organization, Scand. J. Manag., 19, 233, 10.1016/S0956-5221(02)00006-4 · DOI
- Marcelino-Sádaba, 2015, Using project management as a way to sustainability. From a comprehensive review to a framework definition, J. Clean. Prod., 99, 1, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.03.020 · DOI
- Marnewick, 2017, Information System Project's Sustainability Capability Levels, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1151, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.014 · DOI
- Martens, 2016, Sustainability and success variables in the project management context: an expert panel, Proj. Manag. J., 47, 24, 10.1177/875697281604700603 · DOI
- Silvius, 2017, Considering sustainability in project management decision making; an investigation using Q-methodology, Int. J. Proj. Manag., 35, 1133, 10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.01.011 · DOI
- Silvius, 2014, Sustainability in project management: a literature review and impact analysis, Soc. Bus., 4, 10.1362/204440814X13948909253866 · DOI
- Silvius, 2015, Developing a maturity model for assessing sustainable project management, J. Mod. Proj. Manag., 3, 16
- Toderoiu, 2010, Ecological footprint and biocapacity: methodological and regional and national dimensions, Agric. Econ. Rural Dev. New Ser., VII, 213
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rethinking the project life cycle – how circularity challenges processes, roles and governance
Lingegård, S., & Hedborg, S. (2025) · Project Leadership and Society · doi:10.1016/j.plas.2025.100194 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Huemann, M., & Silvius, G.
- Venue
- International Journal of Project Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1066-1070
- ISSN
- 0263-7863
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
