High Relative Biologic Effectiveness of Carbon Ion Radiation on Induction of Rat Mammary Carcinoma and its Lack of H-ras and Tp53 Mutations
Open accessAbstract
Purpose The high relative biologic effectiveness (RBE) of high-linear energy transfer (LET) heavy-ion radiation has enabled powerful radiotherapy. The potential risk of later onset of secondary cancers, however, has not been adequately studied. We undertook the present study to clarify the RBE of therapeutic carbon ion radiation and molecular changes that occur in the rat mammary cancer model. Methods and materials We observed 7-8-week-old rats (ACI, F344, Wistar, and Sprague-Dawley) until 1 year of age after irradiation (0.05-2 Gy) with either 290 MeV/u carbon ions with a spread out Bragg peak (LET 40-90 keV/mum) generated from the Heavy-Ion Medical Accelerator in Chiba or (137)Cs gamma-rays. Results Carbon ions significantly induced mammary carcinomas in Sprague-Dawley rats but less so in other strains. The dose-effect relationship for carcinoma incidence in the Sprague-Dawley rats was concave downward, providing an RBE of 2 at a typical therapeutic dose per fraction. In contrast, approximately 10 should be considered for radiation protection at low doses. Immunohistochemically, 14 of 18 carcinomas were positive for estrogen receptor alpha. All carcinomas examined were free of common H-ras and Tp53 mutations. Importantly, lung metastasis (7%) was characteristic of carbon ion-irradiated rats. Conclusions We found clear genetic variability in the susceptibility to carbon ion-induced mammary carcinomas. The high RBE for carbon ion radiation further supports the importance of p…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In mammary tumors, differences in tumor types comparing heavy ions to low LET radiation were observed, with more aggressive tumors observed.
“Mammary tumors (Illa-Bochaca et al., 2014;Omene et al., 2020;Imaoka et al., 2007) Differences in mammary tumor types comparing heavy ions to low LET radiation with more aggressive tumors observed.”
From A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection (2021) · cites this paper as Imaoka et al., 2007
Cites
Tumorigenic Potential of High-Z, High-LET Charged-Particle Radiations
Alpen, E. L., Powers-Risius, P., Curtis, S. B., & DeGuzman, R. (1993) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3578551 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Okayasu, R., Okada, M., Okabe, A., Noguchi, M., Takakura, K., & Takahashi, S. (2006) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr3489.1 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
High LET radiation carcinogenesis
Fry, R. J. M., Powers-Risius, P., Alpen, E. L., & Ainsworth, E. J. (1985) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3576646 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Neutron carcinogenesis. dose and dose-rate effects in Balb/c mice
Ullrich, R. L., Jernigan, M. C., & Storer, J. B. (1977) · Radiation Research · doi:10.2307/3574612 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Space radiation risks for astronauts on multiple International Space station missions
Cucinotta, F. A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096099 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
A New Approach to Reduce Uncertainties in Space Radiation Cancer Risk Predictions
Cucinotta, F. A. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0120717 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
A proposed change to astronaut exposures limits is a giant leap backwards for radiation protection
Cucinotta, F. A., Schimmerling, W., Blakely, E. A., & Hei, T. K. (2021) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2021.07.005 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Imaoka, T., Nishimura, M., Kakinuma, S., Hatano, Y., Ohmachi, Y., Yoshinaga, S., Kawano, A., Maekawa, A., & Shimada, Y.
- Affiliations
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences (JP)
- National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Imaoka, Tatsuhiko
- Venue
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 194-203
- ISSN
- 0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097343002
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- repo.qst.go.jp
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- QST-Repository (National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Effects of Radiation Exposure
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Keywords
- carbon ion irradiation, heavy ion radiotherapy, breast cancer, HRAS mutation, TP53 mutation, estrogen receptor alpha, lung metastasis, spread-out Bragg peak, rat strain differences
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Carbon, Cesium Radioisotopes, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Female, Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental, Neoplasm Proteins, Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent, Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced, Radiation Protection, Genes, ras, Rats, Inbred ACI, Rats, Inbred F344, Receptors, Estrogen, Relative Biological Effectiveness, Species Specificity, Genes, p53, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Point Mutation, Linear Energy Transfer, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Heavy Ions, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review