Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Roadmap to Clinical Use of Gold Nanoparticles for Radiation Sensitization

Open access
Schuemann, Jan, Berbeco, Ross, Chithrani, Devika B., Cho, Sang Hyun, Kumar, Rajiv, McMahon, Stephen J., Sridhar, Srinivas, Krishnan, Sunil·2016·International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics

Abstract

The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in interest in the use of Gold Nanoparticles (GNPs) as radiation sensitizers for radiotherapy. This interest was initially driven by their strong absorption of ionizing radiation and the resulting ability to increase dose deposited within target volumes even at relatively low concentrations. These early observations are supported by extensive experimental validation, showing GNPs’ efficacy at sensitizing tumors in both in vitro and in vivo systems to a range of types of ionizing radiation, including kilovoltage and megavoltage X-rays as well as charged particles. Despite this experimental validation, there has been limited translation of GNP-mediated radiosensitization to a clinical setting. One of the key challenges in this area is the wide range of experimental systems that have been investigated, spanning a range of particle sizes, shapes and preparations. As a result, mechanisms of uptake and radiosensitization have remained difficult to clearly identify. This has proven a significant impediment to the identification of optimal GNP formulations which strike a balance among their radiosensitizing properties, their specificity to the tumors, their biocompatibility, and their imageability in vivo. This white paper reviews the current state of knowledge in each of the areas concerning the use of GNPs as radiosensitizers, and outlines the steps which will be required to advance GNP-enhanced radiation therapy from their current pre-clinical setting to clinical trials and eventual routine usage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.032

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 84 references

Cited by

See all 253

Metadata

Authors
Schuemann, J., Berbeco, R., Chithrani, D. B., Cho, S. H., Kumar, R., McMahon, S. J., Sridhar, S., & Krishnan, S.
Venue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
94
Issue
1
Pages
189-205
ISSN
0360-3016 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1838570471
Cited by
253
References
84
FWCI
15.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Roadmap to Clinical Use of Gold Nanoparticles for Radiation Sensitization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.032
The paper
Schuemann, J., Berbeco, R., Chithrani, D. B., Cho, S. H., Kumar, R., McMahon, S. J., Sridhar, S., & Krishnan, S. (2016). Roadmap to Clinical Use of Gold Nanoparticles for Radiation Sensitization. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.