The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Google Glass in pediatric surgery: An exploratory study
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Personal portable information technology is advancing at a breathtaking speed. Google has recently introduced Glass, a device that is worn like conventional glasses, but that combines a computerized central processing unit, touchpad, display screen, high-definition camera, microphone, bone-conduction transducer, and wireless connectivity. We have obtained a Glass device through Google's Explorer program and have tested its applicability in our daily pediatric surgical practice and in relevant experimental settings. METHODS: Glass was worn daily for 4 consecutive weeks in a University Children's Hospital. A daily log was kept, and activities with a potential applicability were identified. Performance of Glass was evaluated for such activities. In-vitro experiments were conducted where further testing was indicated. RESULTS: Wearing Glass throughout the day for the study interval was well tolerated. Colleagues, staff, families and patients overwhelmingly had a positive response to Glass. Useful applications for Glass were hands-free photo/videodocumentation, making hands-free telephone calls, looking up billing codes, and internet searches for unfamiliar medical terms or syndromes. Drawbacks encountered with the current equipment were low battery endurance, data protection issues, poor overall audio quality, as well as long transmission latency combined with interruptions and cut-offs during internet videoconferencing. CONCLUSION: Glass has the some clear utility in the clinical setting. However, before it can be recommended universally for physicians and surgeons, substantial improvements to the hardware are required, issues of data protection must be solved, and specialized medical applications (apps) need to be developed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultraflexible organic photonic skin
Yokota, T., Zalar, P., Kaltenbrunner, M., Jinno, H., Matsuhisa, N., Kitanosako, H., Tachibana, Y., Yukita, W., Koizumi, M., & Someya, T. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501856 · Cited by 1,024
Siriwardhana, Y., Porambage, P., Liyanage, M., & Ylianttila, M. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3061981 · Cited by 674
Khor, W. S., Baker, B., Amin, K., Chan, A., Patel, K., & Wong, J. (2016) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2016.12.23 · Cited by 398
Eyeglasses based wireless electrolyte and metabolite sensor platform
Sempionatto, J. R., Nakagawa, T., Pavinatto, A., Mensah, S. T., Imani, S., Mercier, P., & Wang, J. (2017) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c7lc00192d · Cited by 311
Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery
Verhey, J. T., Haglin, J. M., Verhey, E. M., & Hartigan, D. E. (2020) · The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery · doi:10.1002/rcs.2067 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Muensterer, O. J., Lacher, M., Zoeller, C., Bronstein, M., & Kübler, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 281-289
- ISSN
- 1743-9159 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9191
- OpenAlex
- W1990048243
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Google Glass in pediatric surgery: An exploratory study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.003
- The paper
- Muensterer, O. J., Lacher, M., Zoeller, C., Bronstein, M., & Kübler, J. (2014). Google Glass in pediatric surgery: An exploratory study. International Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.