The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of top management leadership styles on ERP assimilation and the role of organizational learning
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This theory has been used extensively in extant literature concerning assimilation of cloud computing (Liang, Ki, Zhang & Li, 2019; Maqueira et al., 2019), ERP assimilation (Shao, Feng & Hu, 2017), tracking technology (Basole & Nowak, 2018), RFID technology (Hossain et al., 2016, Wei, Lowry & Seedorf, 2015) in different management disciplines.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao, Feng & Hu, 2017
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017
In the citing paper
“Research Proposition 5 a-d: Top management support is positively related to HRM (AI) a) initiation, b) adoption, c) routinisation, and d)extension.”
From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Shao et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942 · cited 5×
“In this study, we used the organizational learning framework proposed by March (1991) as the theoretical foundation to define exploitative learning and exploratory learning of ERP systems, as illustrated in Table 2.”
InfluentialStatistical Analysis With Missing Data
Lahiff, M., Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1989) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289883 · Cited by 17,385
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,530
(1998) · Cited by 12,725
Longshore, J. M., & Bass, B. M. (1987) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258081 · Cited by 12,424
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension
Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.6587995 · Cited by 10,758
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Gefen, 2000, Structural equation modelling and regression: guidelines for research practice, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 7, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., Jabbour, C. J. C., Foropon, C. R. H., & Filho, M. G. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.017 · Cited by 1,044
Kumar, P., Singh, R. K., & Kumar, P. V. (2020) · Resources Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105215 · Cited by 424
AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences
Prikshat, V., Malik, A., & Budhwar, P. (2023) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100860 · Cited by 200
Alerasoul, S. A., Afeltra, G., Hakala, H., Minelli, E. A., & Strozzi, F. (2021) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100854 · Cited by 241
Shao, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.010 · Cited by 177
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Shao, Z., Feng, Y., & Hu, Q.
- Affiliations
- Harbin Institute of Technology (CN)
- Baruch College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hu, Qing
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 902-919
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2582371525
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 18.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Information & Management (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- top management leadership, transformational leadership, transactional leadership, organizational learning, learning culture, ERP success, ERP implementation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
