Cited by 197Supercapacitor Materials and FabricationCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies

Sustainable hierarchical porous carbon aerogel from cellulose for high-performance supercapacitor and CO2 capture

Zhuo, Hao, Hu, Yijie, Tong, Xing, Zhong, Linxin, Peng, Xinwen, Sun, Runcang·2016·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Fabrication of cost-effective and eco-friendly hierarchical porous carbons from the most abundant and widely available biomass cellulose represents a critical and sustainable way to solve the crisis of fossil resources. In this work, a hierarchical porous carbon aerogel with desirable macropores, mesopores, and micropores was obtained via dissolving-gelling and subsequent carbonizing-activating process. The CO2 activated carbon aerogel had a high specific surface area of 1364m2/g and a high specific capacitance of 328Fg−1 (0.5Ag−1, 1.0M H2SO4) as well as an outstanding cycling stability with 96% of the capacitance retention after 5000 charge/discharge cycles. More importantly, for the first time, we demonstrated that the cellulose-derived hierarchical porous carbon aerogel showed a good CO2 adsorption capacity of 3.42mmol/g (at 1atm and 298K), which indicates the possibility of using this carbon aerogel for CO2 capture.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.041

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biomass has emerged as an important class of precursors for carbon aerogel fabrication, offering abundant, renewable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective resources.

    “biomass (e.g., cellulose, 17 chitosan, 18 lignin, 19,20 and biomass waste.21 ) has emerged as an important class of precursors for carbon aerogel fabrication, offering abundant, renewable, environmentally friendly, and cost-effective resources.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhuo, H., Hu, Y., Tong, X., Zhong, L., Peng, X., & Sun, R.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zhong, Linxin
  • Peng, Xinwen
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
87
Pages
229-235
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344089845
Cited by
196
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4
FWCI
6.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21506068)
  • State Key Laboratory of Pulp and Paper Engineering (2015ZD03, 2015QN05)
  • Pearl River S&T Nova Program of Guangzhou
  • Guangdong natural Science Foundation (2014A030310319)
  • Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (201504010033)
  • Major State Basic Research Projects of China (973-2012CB215302)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
Keywords
cellulose, biomass-derived carbon, supercapacitor electrodes, CO2 adsorption, CO2 capture, specific capacitance, cycling stability, carbonization and activation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review