The DOI matches its Crossref record; 105 of the 105 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton
Abstract
Abstract Drought stress, caused by lack of precipitation or irrigation, is one of the most challenging problems in crop production in the US and worldwide. Drought alone affects 45% of the world’s agricultural land, further, 19.5% of irrigated agricultural lands are considered saline. A combination of two or more abiotic stresses, such as drought and salinity results in more yield loss than a single stress. Drought along with salinization is expected to cause up to 50% of arable land loss worldwide. Development of drought and/or salt stress tolerant cultivars represents one of the most practical solutions. Genetic variation in abiotic stress tolerance exists within Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.); however, most if not all Upland cultivars have been developed under normal well-watered and non-saline conditions. Pima, Sea-Island or Egyptian cotton (G. barbadense L.), carries some level of tolerance to abioitc stresses due to their origin near sea-coasts, and this tolerance can be transferred to Upland cotton by interspecific introgression. Although drought and salt stress tolerances are presumed to be interconnected, the genetic basis is not fully understood due to complexity of the stress resistance and difficulties in phenotyping. The objective of this review was to summarize the progress in screening methodology, resistance germplasm sources, inheritance, biochemical and molecular aspects, transgenic approaches, and quantitative trait loci (QTL) for drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. In the last 10–15 years, significant progress has been made in understanding the genetic basis of drought and salt tolerance through QTL mapping using molecular markers on biparental and multi-parental populations and natural populations. Numerous drought or salt responsive genes have been identified, some of which include those commonly associated with drought or salt tolerance in other plants and are used in transgenic approaches for enhancement of abiotic stress tolerance. However, none of these genes have been utilized in commercial cotton breeding programs, and no abiotic stress tolerance QTL has been used in cotton breeding through marker-assisted selection (MAS). More and larger permanent intra-specific and interspecific mapping populations using diverse and multiple parents should be developed. These populations are necessary for repeated phenotyping for abiotic stress tolerance and for high resolution mapping of QTL using genome-wide SNP markers and for MAS to transfer tolerance genes to high-yielding cultivars. Further, quick, reliable and high throughput screening methods applicable for large scale populations need to be developed to improve the reliability and scale of phenotyping of the cotton germplasm in these populations for drought and salt stress tolerance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Zhang, F., Li, S., Yang, S., Wang, L., & Guo, W. (2014) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-014-0260-3 · Cited by 73
RetractedMechanisms of Salinity Tolerance
Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 · Cited by 13,792
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,501
Comparative physiology of salt and water stress
Munns, R. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x · Cited by 6,331
Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell.
Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 · Cited by 4,181
Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management
Farooq, M., Wahid, A., Kobayashi, N., Fujita, D., & Basra, S. M. A. (2009) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1051/agro:2008021 · Cited by 4,098
Plant productivity and environment
Boyer, J. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.218.4571.443 · Cited by 3,959
Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants
Short, T. W. (2001) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · Cited by 3,833
Wang, W., Vinocur, B., & Altman, A. (2003) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-003-1105-5 · Cited by 3,678
Crop Salt Tolerance—Current Assessment
Maas, E. V., & Hoffman, G. J. (1977) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0001137 · Cited by 3,565
Cited by
Seed Priming: A Feasible Strategy to Enhance Drought Tolerance in Crop Plants
Marthandan, V., Geetha, R., Kumutha, K., Renganathan, V. G., Karthikeyan, A., & Ramalingam, J. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21218258 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdelraheem, A., Esmaeili, N., O’Connell, M., & Zhang, J.
- Venue
- Industrial Crops and Products
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 118-129
- ISSN
- 0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906949511
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 105
- FWCI
- 17.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.070
- The paper
- Abdelraheem, A., Esmaeili, N., O’Connell, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Industrial Crops and Products. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.12.070
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.