The DOI matches its Crossref record; 136 of the 136 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375 · Cited by 15,386
Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study
Ahuja, G. (2000) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667105 · Cited by 5,079
A Multi‐Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x · Cited by 3,244
Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital
Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(200003)21:3<217::aid-smj95>3.0.co;2-y · Cited by 2,980
Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions
Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006 · Cited by 2,184
The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods
Buchanan, D., & Bryman, A. E. (2009) · Cited by 2,123
”Coopetition” in Business Networks—to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously
Bengtsson, M., & Kock, S. (2000) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00067-x · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationTsai, W. (2002) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.536 · Cited by 1,905
Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic equilibrium Model of Organizing
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2009.0223 · Cited by 1,631
Competitor Analysis and Interfirm Rivalry: Toward a Theoretical Integration
Chen, M.-J. (1996) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258631 · Cited by 1,559
Cited by
The interplay of competition and cooperation
Hoffmann, W., Lavie, D., Reuer, J. J., & Shipilov, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2965 · Cited by 378
Paradoxes and Dual Processes: A Review and Synthesis
Keller, J., & Sadler‐Smith, E. (2019) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12200 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T.
- Venue
- Industrial Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 23-39
- ISSN
- 0019-8501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2427265476
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 136
- FWCI
- 9.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003
- The paper
- Bengtsson, M., & Raza-Ullah, T. (2016). A systematic review of research on coopetition: Toward a multilevel understanding. Industrial Marketing Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
