Cited by 44Infant Health and DevelopmentBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesInfant Development and Preterm Care

The impact of breastfeeding on mothers' attentional sensitivity towards infant distress

Pearson, R.M., Lightman, S.L., Evans, J.·2011·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Background Maternal response towards infant distress has an important impact on infant development. In animals it is established that lactation and pup suckling plays an important role in maintaining maternal responses. Previous research suggests that breastfeeding is associated with sensitive maternal responses in human mothers. However, this may be because women who are more sensitive to their infant choose to breastfeed. The current study investigated the attentional sensitivity towards infant distress in women who went on to breast or formula feed during pregnancy as well as after birth. We hypothesised that differences in breast and formula feeding mothers would only emerge after birth once feeding had commenced.Method Women were recruited during pregnancy through community midwives as part of a longitudinal study. 51 women were seen during late pregnancy and between 3 and 6 months after birth (27 were breast and 24 were formula feeding). Sensitivity to infant distress was measured as the extent of women's attentional bias towards infant distress stimuli.Results After birth, we found that our index of attentional bias towards infant distress was 37 ms (0.5 S.D.s) (CI; 6-69, p = 0.021) higher in breastfeeding compared to formula feeding mothers. However, mothers who went on to breastfeed did not show greater attentional bias towards infant distress already during late pregnancy.Conclusions Our results suggest that the act of breastfeeding may influence mothers' attentional sensitivity towards infant distress. Previous research suggests breastfeeding is indicative of sensitive parenting. The current findings may suggest a mechanism by which breastfeeding and/or associated infant interaction could contribute to this sensitivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.12.009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Attention bias to infants' distress has been observed to be greater in breastfeeding mothers than in formula-feeding mothers of infants three to six months old.

    “Attention bias to infants’ distress has also been compared between breastfeeding and formula-feeding mothers of infants three to six months old and observed to be greater in breastfeeding mothers (Pearson et al., 2011).”

    From The maternal brain and its plasticity in humans (2016) · cites this paper as Pearson et al., 2011

  • Attention bias to infant distress was greater in breastfeeding mothers compared to formula feeding mothers of 3-6 month old infants.

    “Attention bias to infant distress was also compared between breastfeeding and formula feeding mothers of 3–6 month old infants and observed to be greater in breastfeeding mothers (Pearson et al., 2011).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pearson, R. M., Lightman, S. L., & Evans, J.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Corresponding author
Pearson, R.M.
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
200-205
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970080603
Cited by
44
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
breastfeeding, bottle feeding, infant distress, maternal sensitivity, parental sensitivity, infant interaction, pregnancy, postpartum period, lactation
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Breast Feeding, Computer Simulation, Educational Status, Emotions, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Maternal Behavior, Parity, Photic Stimulation, Pregnancy, Social Class, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review