Cited by 47Speech and Audio ProcessingSpeech Recognition and SynthesisMultisensory perception and integration

Multimodal audio-visual information fusion using canonical-correlated graph neural network for energy-efficient speech enhancement

Open access
Passos, Leandro A., Papa, João Paulo, Del Ser, Javier, Hussain, Amir, Adeel, Ahsan·2023·Information Fusion

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.006

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Camera-based single-modal 3D object detection infers 3D information from 2D images; RGB images provide rich visual data but lack direct depth perception, requiring complex estimation, making detection vulnerable to occlusions, poor angles, and adverse weather.

    “Camera-based single-modal 3D object detection [1, 72, 2, 3] infers 3D information from 2D images.While RGB images provide rich visual data, the lack of direct depth perception requires complex estimation techniques, making detection vulnerable to occlusions, poor angles, and adverse weather conditions.”

    From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [72]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passos, L. A., Papa, J. P., Del Ser, J., Hussain, A., & Adeel, A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • University of Wolverhampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Adeel, Ahsan
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
90
Pages
1-11
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283832388
Cited by
47
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T021063/1)
  • Centro para el Desarrollo Tecnológico Industrial
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT1456-22)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
audio-visual speech enhancement, canonical correlation analysis, graph neural networks, multimodal representation learning, self-supervised learning, temporal context modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review