Cited by 89Sentiment Analysis and Opinion MiningEmotion and Mood RecognitionMultimodal Machine Learning Applications

Analyzing Multimodal Sentiment Via Acoustic- and Visual-LSTM With Channel-Aware Temporal Convolution Network

Mai, Sijie, Xing, Songlong, Hu, Haifeng·2021·IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing

Abstract

The emotion of human is always expressed in a multimodal perspective. Analyzing multimodal human sentiment remains challenging due to the difficulties of the interpretation in inter-modality dynamics. Mainstream multimodal learning architectures tend to design various fusion strategies to learn inter-modality interactions, which barely consider the fact that the language modality is far more important than the acoustic and visual modalities. In contrast, we learn inter-modality dynamics in a different perspective via acoustic- and visual-LSTMs where language features play dominant role. Specifically, inside each LSTM variant, a well-designed gating mechanism is introduced to enhance the language representation via the corresponding auxiliary modality. Furthermore, in the unimodal representation learning stage, instead of using RNNs, we introduce `channel-aware' temporal convolution network to extract high-level representations for each modality to explore both temporal and channel-wise interdependencies. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves very competitive performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods on three widely-used benchmarks for multimodal sentiment analysis and emotion recognition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/taslp.2021.3068598

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mai, S., Xing, S., & Hu, H.
Affiliations
Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Venue
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing
Published
2021
Volume
29
Pages
1424-1437
ISSN
  • 2329-9290 (ISSN-L)
  • 2329-9304
OpenAlex
W3141688548
Cited by
89
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 5
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1601101, 2018YFB1601100)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62076262)
  • Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2017A030311029)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
Keywords
multimodal sentiment analysis, emotion recognition, gating mechanism, temporal representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review