Cited by 115Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning

FusionFedBlock: Fusion of blockchain and federated learning to preserve privacy in industry 5.0

Singh, Sushil Kumar, Yang, Laurence T., Park, Jong Hyuk·2023·Information Fusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2022.09.027

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, S. K., Yang, L. T., & Park, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • St. Francis Xavier University (CA)
Corresponding author
Park, Jong Hyuk
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-02
Volume
90
Pages
233-240
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298148350
Cited by
115
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 1
FWCI
23.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea
  • Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2022R1F1A1071926)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Keywords
blockchain, federated learning, Industry 5.0, privacy preservation, Internet of Things, distributed hash tables, decentralized storage, network automation, Internet of Things security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review