Challenges of shared decision-making: A multiple case study of agile software development
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inadequate tool support for sharing, version control, and tracing of scattered design documentation.
“Inadequate tool support for sharing, version control, and tracing of scattered design documentation ( filetext , cogs ).”
From Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities (2023) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659 · see citing works
Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 · Cited by 2,668 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This may alleviate or exacerbate development problems [11].”
Self-citationIs there a “Big Five” in Teamwork?
Salas, E., Sims, D. E., & Burke, C. S. (2005) · Small Group Research · doi:10.1177/1046496405277134 · Cited by 1,930 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do Agile Managed Information Systems Projects Fail Due to a Lack of Emotional Intelligence?
Luong, T. T., Sivarajah, U., & Weerakkody, V. (2021) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09962-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Software Architecture in Practice: Challenges and Opportunities
Wan, Z., Zhang, Y., Xia, X., Jiang, Y., & Lo, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 31st ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3611643.3616367 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“…(e.g., [33]), methods (e.g., [26]), and tools (e.g., [31]), and shift their focus towards addressing the social and psychological aspects of architectural decision making behaviors including naturalistic and rational decision making [66], cognitive biases [67], and group decision making [11, 80].”
Method
- Authors
- Moe, N. B., Aurum, A., & Dybå, T.
- Affiliations
- SINTEF (NO)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Aurum, Aybüke
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 853-865
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062616630
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 26.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
- Keywords
- shared decision-making, agile software development, Scrum, software development teams, strategic planning, iteration planning, resource allocation, team coordination, naturalistic decision making, hierarchical decision-making, organizational change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
