Cited by 112Environmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisEnergy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis

Life cycle assessment of open field and greenhouse cultivation of lettuce and barley

Open access
Bartzas, Georgios, Zaharaki, Dimitra, Komnitsas, Kostas·2015·Information Processing in Agriculture

Abstract

In the present paper, a life cycle assessment (LCA) study regarding barley and lettuce production in Spain (Barrax and Santomera regions) and Italy (Albenga region) in both open field (OF) and standard greenhouse (GH) cultivations was performed in order to evaluate energy consumption and environmental impacts. The study examines also the impact of the use of compost produced from agricultural wastes (AW). In this context, a detailed life cycle directory was created, based on site-specific experimental data, and used for a holistic cradle-to-gate LCA analysis using the GaBi 6 software package and specific related databases. In order to reveal the importance of system boundaries, factors that are often excluded from LCA studies, such as agricultural machinery manufacture, nursery production, waste management and raw materials transportation have been considered. According to the results of this study, the use of compost for fertilization of both crops is considered a good agronomic and ecological strategy in order to maintain productivity in terms of yield, especially in the case of greenhouse cultivation, and improve overall sustainability in the agricultural sector. Moreover, the phases of compost production, irrigation system, and greenhouse construction and operation were identified as the three main “hot-spots” with the highest environmental impact and energy contribution in all studied cases. Finally, improvements to reduce those impacts were proposed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inpa.2015.10.001

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In general, results of this study are within range of those found in literature across all production systems.

    “In general, the results of this study are within the range of those found in literature across all the productions systems (Bartzas et al., 2015; Fiteinis and Chatzisymeon, 2016; Frankowska et al., 2019; Plawecki et al., 2014; Romero-Gámez et al., 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bartzas, G., Zaharaki, D., & Komnitsas, K.
Affiliations
  • National Technical University of Athens (GR)
  • Technical University of Crete (GR)
Corresponding author
Komnitsas, Kostas
Venue
Information Processing in Agriculture
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
2
Issue
3-4
Pages
191-207
ISSN
2214-3173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2210431006
Cited by
112
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Information Processing in Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, Agriculture Analysis
Keywords
lettuce, barley, greenhouse cultivation, open-field cultivation, agricultural waste recycling, energy consumption, environmental impact, cradle-to-gate analysis, irrigation systems, greenhouse construction, agricultural machinery, crop sustainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review