Cited by 64Usability and User Interface DesignInteractive and Immersive DisplaysData Visualization and Analytics

Desktop virtual environments: A study of navigation and age

Sayers, H.·2004·Interacting with Computers

Abstract

Navigation in virtual environments on desktop systems is known to be problematic. Research into the usability of the tools presented on two-dimensional interfaces indicates that, for even relatively simple tasks, users experience some degree of frustration. As the user community broadens with an increasing range of applications and services making use of three-dimensional presentation, the usability of these interfaces becomes ever more important. In this paper, we describe the results of an experiment performed to evaluate the usability of a number of visual navigation tools and the effect for two age groups (18–45 and 46+). Results indicate that, for both age groups, the visual presentation of navigational aids improves navigation performance in terms of both time taken to complete tasks, and user satisfaction with the system. In all experimental conditions younger participants achieved better performance times, although the gap between the groups decreased when a choice of navigation aids was presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intcom.2004.05.003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults may have under-reported their feelings of disorientation because older participants tend to focus on positive aspects of their experience and have more desire to be polite and socially desirable.

    “Older adults under-reported their feelings of disorientation since older participants have a tendency to focus on the positive aspects of their experience and report feelings more positive than observed by the experimenter (Sayers, 2004), and have more of a desire to be polite and socially desirable (Dickinson et al., 2007).”

    From The impact of age on website usability (2014) · cites this paper as Sayers, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sayers, H.
Affiliations
University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Sayers, H.
Venue
Interacting with Computers
Published
2004-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
939-956
ISSN
0953-5438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996800232
Cited by
64
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Interacting with Computers (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
Keywords
virtual worlds, desktop virtual environments, visual navigation, navigation aids, age differences, usability, three-dimensional interfaces, user satisfaction, navigation performance, elderly users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review