CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The correlation between g loadings and heritability in Japan: A meta-analysis

te Nijenhuis, Jan, Kura, Kenya, Hur, Yoon-Mi·2014·Intelligence
DOI 10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies.

    “This combination of a simplified procedure and a meta-analysis has already been successfully applied in several studies, some of them often cited [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].”

    From Spearman’s Hypothesis Tested on Black Adults: A Meta-Analysis (2016) · cites this paper as [29]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
te Nijenhuis, J., Kura, K., & Hur, Y.-M.
Affiliations
  • Gifu Shotoku Gakuen University (JP)
  • Mokpo National University (KR)
ORCID
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
46
Pages
275-282
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.intell.2014.07.008
OpenAlex
W2090397741
Cited by
16
References
1
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
general intelligence, heritability, twin studies, cross-cultural comparison, Japanese population, moderator effects, sample size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review