Cited by 24Cognitive Abilities and TestingIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Racial and ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Pesta, Bryan J., Kirkegaard, Emil O.W., te Nijenhuis, Jan, Lasker, Jordan, Fuerst, John G.R.·2020·Intelligence

Abstract

Via meta-analysis, we examined whether the heritability of intelligence varies across racial or ethnic groups. Specifically, we tested a hypothesis predicting an interaction whereby those racial and ethnic groups living in relatively disadvantaged environments display lower heritability and higher environmentality. The reasoning behind this prediction is that people (or groups of people) raised in poor environments may not be able to realize their full genetic potentials. Our sample (k = 16) comprised 84,897 Whites, 37,160 Blacks, and 17,678 Hispanics residing in the United States. We found that White, Black, and Hispanic heritabilities were consistently moderate to high, and that these heritabilities did not differ across groups. At least in the United States, Race/Ethnicity × Heritability interactions likely do not exist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2019.101408

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The heritability of intelligence is high and virtually identical in European and African-American populations.

    “This difference exists even though the heritability of intelligence is both high and virtually identical in the European and African-American populations [4].”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [4]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. *Pesta, 2019, Racial and ethnic group differences in the heritability of intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Intelligence
  2. Scarr, 1995, What is equality? Review of the bell curve, Issues in Science and Technology, 11, 82
  3. Turkheimer, 2017, Charles Murray is once again peddling junk science about race and IQ, Vox
  4. Turkheimer, 2014, Interactions between socioeconomic status and components of variation in cognitive ability. In Behavior genetics of cognition across the Lifespan, Advances in Behavior Genetics, 1, 41

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pesta, B. J., Kirkegaard, E. O. W., te Nijenhuis, J., Lasker, J., & Fuerst, J. G. R.
Affiliations
  • Cleveland State University (US)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Pesta, Bryan J.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
78
Pages
101408
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2991458744
Cited by
24
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
heritability of intelligence, racial and ethnic differences, environmentality, gene-environment interaction, socioeconomic deprivation, genetic potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review