A negative Flynn effect in France, 1999 to 2008–9
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For most measures, taking into account test order and age group did not substantively change Dutton and Lynn's conclusions.
“A series of ANOVAs indicated that for most measures, taking into account test order and age group did not substantively change Dutton and Lynn's conclusions.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Dutton and Lynn's (2015) interpretation considers all subtests of the WAIS as interchangeable measures of intelligence.
“Besides methodological issues, Dutton and Lynn's (2015) interpretation considers all subtests of the WAIS as interchangeable measures of intelligence.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
The descriptive statistics for age in the sample were M = 44.53 years, SD = 13.71 years, range = 30 to 63 years.
“The descriptive statistics for age, as stated in the test manual and in Dutton and Lynn (2015), were M = 44.53years, SD = 13.71years, range = 30 to 63 years.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Dutton and Lynn (2015) compared performance averages reported in the test manual for the validity sample and observed that these subjects had higher standardized scores on the WAIS-IV than on the WAIS-III.
“Dutton and Lynn (2015) compared performance averages reported in the test manual for this validity sample, and observed that these subjects had higher standardized scores on the WAIS-IV (in reference to its 2009 normative sample) than on the WAIS-III (in reference to its 1999 normative sample).”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Dutton and Lynn (2015) published a study claiming that intelligence scores in France are decreasing.
“In 2015, Dutton and Lynn published a study claiming that intelligence scores in France are decreasing.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Comparing this result with the size of the difference between WAIS-III and WAIS-IV suggested that differential test functioning explained much or all of the score difference interpreted by Dutton and Lynn (2015) as a negative Flynn effect.
“Comparing this result with the size of the difference between WAIS-III and WAIS-IV suggested that differential test functioning explained much or all of the score difference interpreted by Dutton and Lynn (2015) as a negative Flynn effect.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Woodley of Menie and Dunkel (2015) argued that the results of Dutton and Lynn (2015) indicated a biological origin for the decline of performance between WAIS-III and WAIS-IV in French subjects.
“Woodley of Menie and Dunkel (2015) argued that the results of Dutton and Lynn (2015) indicated a biological origin for the decline of performance between WAIS-III and WAIS-IV in French subjects.”
From No negative Flynn effect in France: Why variations of intelligence should not be assessed using tests based on cultural knowledge (2021) · cites this paper as Dutton and Lynn (2015)
Cites
Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.66 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
The Flynn effect: A meta-analysis.
Trahan, L. H., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., & Hiscock, M. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0037173 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The negative Flynn Effect: A systematic literature review
Dutton, E., van der Linden, D., & Lynn, R. (2016) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2016.10.002 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationDworak, E. M., Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2023) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2023.101734 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Gonthier, C., Grégoire, J., & Besançon, M. (2021) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2020.101512 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dutton, E., & Lynn, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Oulu (FI)
- University of Ulster (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Dutton, Edward
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 51
- Pages
- 67-70
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W602467646
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 12.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Keywords
- WAIS-III, WAIS-IV, French adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
