Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 425

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 80 of the 80 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Impact of Website Quality on Information Quality, Value, and Loyalty Intentions in Apparel Retailing

Kim, Hyejeong, Niehm, Linda S.·2009·Journal of Interactive Marketing

Abstract

This study investigated relationships among website quality, perceived information quality, perceived value, and loyalty intentions in the context of apparel online shopping. Analysis of data using structural equation modeling showed that among the website quality dimensions, interactivity, online completeness, ease of use, and entertainment significantly influence perceived information quality. Perceived information quality affects perceived value and loyalty intentions and perceived value influences loyalty intentions toward apparel retail websites. The post-hoc test revealed that entertainment and trust affect perceived value. Online completeness and entertainment were found to influence loyalty intentions. Strategic suggestions are provided for e-retailer improvement of website information quality, such as utilizing entertaining and engaging devices and designing their websites for consumer comprehension and enjoyment during the shopping experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 80 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Bellenger Danny N., 1976, Journal of Retailing, 52, 17
  2. Chen Qimei, 1999, Journal of Advertising Research, 39, 27
  3. 10.1016/S0019-8501(97)00038-2 · doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(97)00038-2
  4. Loiacono Eleanor T., 2002, Proceedings in Winter Educators Conference, 432
  5. Njite David, 2005, Journal of Services Research, 5, 43
  6. Nunnally Jum G. Psychometric Theory 1967 McGraw-Hill New York
  7. Parasuraman A., 1988, Journal of Retailing, 64, 12
  8. Wallace David J., 1995, Advertising Age, 20
  9. Watkins Paul, 2008, Journal of Accounting, 15, 71
  10. Wu Bob, 2004, Marketing Management Journal, 14, 14
  11. Xu Hongjuang, 2004, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45, 73
  12. Yoo Boonghee, 2001, Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2, 31
  13. 10.1177/002224299606000203 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 425

Metadata

Authors
Kim, H., & Niehm, L. S.
Venue
Journal of Interactive Marketing
Published
2009-08
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
221-233
ISSN
  • 1094-9968 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6653
OpenAlex
W2019872794
Cited by
425
References
80
FWCI
18.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Website Quality on Information Quality, Value, and Loyalty Intentions in Apparel Retailing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009
The paper
Kim, H., & Niehm, L. S. (2009). The Impact of Website Quality on Information Quality, Value, and Loyalty Intentions in Apparel Retailing. Journal of Interactive Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.