Cited by 810Technology Adoption and User BehaviourMedia and Digital CommunicationLegal Systems and Institutions

What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement

Chen, Chia-Chen, Lin, Yi-Chen·2018·Telematics and Informatics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, C.-C., & Lin, Y.-C.
Affiliations
National Chung Hsing University (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Chia-Chen
Venue
Telematics and Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-04
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
293-303
ISSN
0736-5853 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2771910743
Cited by
810
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 104 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 177 · 2023: 141 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
23.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2018-09-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
Telematics and Informatics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Legal Systems and Institutions
Keywords
live streaming, intention to use, flow, entertainment, social interaction, attitudes, perceived value, social network sites, stress reduction, gender differences, age differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review