Cited by 16Usability and User Interface DesignPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareTechnology Use by Older Adults

ListeningTime; participatory development of a web-based preparatory communication tool for elderly cancer patients and their healthcare providers

Open access
Noordman, Janneke, Driesenaar, Jeanine A., van Bruinessen, Inge R., van Dulmen, Sandra·2017·Internet Interventions

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper outlines the participatory development process of a web-based preparatory communication tool for elderly cancer patients and their oncological healthcare providers (HCPs). This tool aims to support them to (better) prepare their encounters. An overarching aim of the project is to develop the tool in a participatory way to increase uptake and use. METHODS: Scrum, a participatory framework originated from software development, was applied to develop the tool. Using constant feedback loops, elderly (former) cancer patients, oncological HCPs and their representatives were, as end-users, involved. RESULTS: During six 'sprints', the communication tool 'ListeningTime' was developed with input from end-users. The use of scrum in developing an innovative tool was challenging in this context, because of time constraints of seriously-ill patients and busy HCPs and the co-creation involving non-profit scientific researchers and a for-profit development company. CONCLUSIONS: The collaboration with end-users facilitated the development process of ListeningTime. Early involvement of end-users and flexibility in terms of planning and setup appear to be preconditions for creating a bottom-up inspired development procedure. Several challenges emerged from using scrum as participatory framework. Nevertheless, the 'pressure cooking situation', using scrum, resulted in a quick development process and a product ready for implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2017.05.002

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Symposium Panta Rhei, TU Delft http://www.emerce.nl/opinie/teveel-focus-op-agilescrum-staat-echte-innovatie-in-de-weg (Accessed November 17, 2016)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noordman, J., Driesenaar, J. A., van Bruinessen, I. R., & van Dulmen, S.
Affiliations
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Noordman, Janneke
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
9
Pages
51-56
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2620593995
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
KWF Kankerbestrijding (NIVEL 2014-7271)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
participatory development, web-based communication tools, elderly cancer patients, patient-provider communication, Scrum, co-creation, end-user involvement, bottom-up development, serious illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review