Cited by 15Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Worry-specific versus self-tailored internet-based treatments for generalized anxiety disorder, with scheduled support or support on demand: A pilot factorial design trial

Open access
Dahlin, Mats, Johansson, Andreas, Romare, Harry, Carlbring, Per, Andersson, Gerhard·2022·Internet Interventions

Abstract

Studies suggest that internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT) can be effective when treating generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). This pilot factorial design study examined the effects of two types of ICBT (worry-specific and self-tailored treatment), and two support types (scheduled weekly support and support on demand), on measures of worry, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. Participants (N = 85) were randomized into four treatment groups. Post-treatment measures were completed by 76.5% after eight weeks (n = 65). Intention to treat analysis showed significant improvements, with moderate to large within-group effects on the primary outcome measure, Penn State Worry Questionnaire (Cohen's d = 0.77–1.43). Minor to large effects on the secondary measures were found in all groups (Cohen's d = 0.13–1.66). No significant differences in outcome measures were found between the groups. Receiving scheduled support and self-tailored treatment was rated as more positive than receiving support on demand and the worry-specific program. A limitation is the low number of participants. The pilot results suggest that GAD can be treated with both worry-specific and self-tailored treatments, and that ICBT can be supported both with scheduled and support on demand.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100531

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 60 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. American Psychiatric Association Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria From DSM-5 2013 American Psychiatric Press Washington
  2. Fisher P.L. The Efficacy of Psychological Treatments for Generalised Anxiety Disorder? Worry And Its Psychological Disorders: Theory, Assessment And Treatment 2006 Wiley Publishing 359 377

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahlin, M., Johansson, A., Romare, H., Carlbring, P., & Andersson, G.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Gerhard
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-04
Volume
28
Pages
100531
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220659070
Cited by
15
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, treatment acceptability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review