Cited by 50Internet of Things and AITechnology Use by Older AdultsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Evaluating Internet of Medical Things (IoMT)-Based Systems from a Human-Centric Perspective

Kotronis, Christos, Routis, Ioannis, Politi, Elena, Nikolaidou, Mara, Dimitrakopoulos, George, Anagnostopoulos, Dimosthenis, Amira, Abbes, Bensaali, Faycal +1 more·2019·Internet of Things

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iot.2019.100125

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotronis, C., Routis, I., Politi, E., Nikolaidou, M., Dimitrakopoulos, G., Anagnostopoulos, D., Amira, A., Bensaali, F., & Djelouat, H.
Affiliations
  • Harokopio University of Athens (GR)
  • De Montfort University (GB)
  • Qatar University (QA)
Corresponding author
Kotronis, Christos
Venue
Internet of Things
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-12
Volume
8
Pages
100125
ISSN
2542-6605 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980841175
Cited by
50
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internet of Things (publishedVersion)
  • Qatar University QSpace (Qatar University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Qatar National Research Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Internet of Things and AI
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
Internet of Medical Things, human-centered design, user concerns, user satisfaction, user acceptance, remote patient monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review