CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 164Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorLibrary Science and Information LiteracyRecommender Systems and Techniques

Using the taxonomy of cognitive learning to model online searching

Jansen, Bernard J., Booth, Danielle, Smith, Brian·2009·Information Processing & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bloom's taxonomy is a hierarchical framework in which learning at a higher level depends on skills and knowledge attained at a lower level.

    “Bloom's taxonomy is a hierarchical framework that outlines cognitive processes, suggesting that learning at a higher level depends on skills and knowledge attained at a lower level.”

    From Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Gaps: The Impact of GenAI and Search Technologies on Retention (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jansen, B. J., Booth, D., & Smith, B.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Jansen, Bernard J.
ORCID
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
643-663
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
DOI
10.1016/j.ipm.2009.05.004
OpenAlex
W2125671490
Cited by
164
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
information searching, Bloom's taxonomy, online search behavior, information needs, search effort, learning levels, fact-checking, learning styles, search systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review