The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An evaluation of document clustering and topic modelling in two online social networks: Twitter and Reddit
Abstract
Abstract Methods for document clustering and topic modelling in online social networks (OSNs) offer a means of categorising, annotating and making sense of large volumes of user generated content. Many techniques have been developed over the years, ranging from text mining and clustering methods to latent topic models and neural embedding approaches. However, many of these methods deliver poor results when applied to OSN data as such text is notoriously short and noisy, and often results are not comparable across studies. In this study we evaluate several techniques for document clustering and topic modelling on three datasets from Twitter and Reddit. We benchmark four different feature representations derived from term-frequency inverse-document-frequency (tf-idf) matrices and word embedding models combined with four clustering methods, and we include a Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic model for comparison. Several different evaluation measures are used in the literature, so we provide a discussion and recommendation for the most appropriate extrinsic measures for this task. We also demonstrate the performance of the methods over data sets with different document lengths. Our results show that clustering techniques applied to neural embedding feature representations delivered the best performance over all data sets using appropriate extrinsic evaluation measures. We also demonstrate a method for interpreting the clusters with a top-words based approach using tf-idf weights combined with embedding distance measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944937 · Cited by 32,337
Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space
Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1301.3781 · Cited by 26,568
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
Cohen, W. W., McCallum, A., & Roweis, S. T. (2008) · Cited by 5,691
Software Framework for Topic Modelling with Large Corpora
Rek, R. R. U., & Sojka, P. (2010) · doi:10.13140/2.1.2393.1847 · Cited by 3,647
A neural probabilistic language model
BengioYoshua, DucharmeRéjean, VincentPascal, & JanvinChristian (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944966 · Cited by 2,644
Vinh, N. X., Epps, J., & Bailey, J. (2010) · Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) · doi:10.5555/1756006.1953024 · Cited by 1,781
Empirical study of topic modeling in Twitter
Hong, L., & Davison, B. D. (2010) · Proceedings of the First Workshop on Social Media Analytics · doi:10.1145/1964858.1964870 · Cited by 1,120
Information diffusion in online social networks: a survey
Guille, A., Hacid, H., Favre, C., & Zighed, D. A. (2013) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/2503792.2503797 · Cited by 851
Cited by
Sentiment analysis on product reviews based on weighted word embeddings and deep neural networks
Onan, A. (2021) · Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience · doi:10.1002/cpe.5909 · Cited by 396
Onan, A. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2945911 · Cited by 257
Metadata
- Authors
- Curiskis, S. A., Drake, B., Osborn, T. R., & Kennedy, P. J.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-03
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102034
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W2938824800
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An evaluation of document clustering and topic modelling in two online social networks: Twitter and Reddit. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.04.002
- The paper
- Curiskis, S. A., Drake, B., Osborn, T. R., & Kennedy, P. J. (2020). An evaluation of document clustering and topic modelling in two online social networks: Twitter and Reddit. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.04.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.