The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Chatbot as an emergency exist: Mediated empathy for resilience via human-AI interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
As a global health crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic has also made heavy mental and emotional tolls become shared experiences of global communities, especially among females who were affected more by the pandemic than males for anxiety and depression. By connecting multiple facets of empathy as key mechanisms of information processing with the communication theory of resilience, the present study examines human-AI interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to understand digitally mediated empathy and how the intertwining of empathic and communicative processes of resilience works as coping strategies for COVID-19 disruption. Mixed methods were adopted to explore the using experiences and effects of Replika, a chatbot companion powered by AI, with ethnographic research, in-depth interviews, and grounded theory-based analysis. Findings of this research extend empathy theories from interpersonal communication to human-AI interactions and show five types of digitally mediated empathy among Chinese female Replika users with varying degrees of cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and empathic response involved in the information processing processes, i.e., companion buddy, responsive diary, emotion-handling program, electronic pet, and tool for venting. When processing information obtained from AI and collaborative interactions with the AI chatbot, multiple facets of mediated empathy become unexpected pathways to resilience and enhance users' well-being. This study fills the research gap by exploring empathy and resilience processes in human-AI interactions. Practical implications, especially for increasing individuals' psychological resilience as an important component of global recovery from the pandemic, suggestions for future chatbot design, and future research directions are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While these developments have sparked widespread public and academic interest, empirical studies on the mechanisms through which users form emotional connections with chatbots remain limited.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Saldaña, J. (2025) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036235611 · Cited by 19,193
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012) · APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. · doi:10.1037/13620-004 · Cited by 10,299
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851
Santomauro, D. F., Mantilla Herrera, A. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02143-7 · Cited by 5,444
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Ethnography: Principles in Practice
Stebbins, R. A., Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1985) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340052 · Cited by 4,082
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Guo, 2020, Emotional health status and social mentality of the Chinese general public during the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia pandemic, Science & Technology Review, 38, 68
- Sawyier, 1975, A conceptual analysis of empathy, Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 37
- Wilkinson, 2022, The people in intimate relationships with AI Chatbots, VICE
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ma, X., & Huo, Y. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102362 · Cited by 386
Pentina, I., Xie, T., Hancock, T. D., & Bailey, A. A. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21853 · Cited by 214
Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots
Li, H. Z., & Zhang, R. (2024) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmae015 · Cited by 186
Finding Love in Algorithms: Deciphering the Emotional Contexts of Close Encounters with AI Chatbots
Li, H., & Zhang, R. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xd4k7 · Cited by 150
Zhang, R., Li, H., Meng, H., Zhan, J., Gan, H., & Lee, Y.-C. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713429 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Pian, W.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pian, Wenjing
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 103074
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- PMC
- PMC9428597
- OpenAlex
- W4293745145
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904028)
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (18ZDA307)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- chatbots, human-AI interaction, psychological resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, Replika, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, female users, mental health, coping strategies, chatbot design, Chinese users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review