CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 165Social Robot Interaction and HRIDigital Mental Health InterventionsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Chatbot as an emergency exist: Mediated empathy for resilience via human-AI interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic

Open access
Jiang, Qiaolei, Zhang, Yadi, Pian, Wenjing·2022·Information Processing & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103074PMC PMC9428597
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As a global health crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic has also made heavy mental and emotional tolls become shared experiences of global communities, especially among females who were affected more by the pandemic than males for anxiety and depression. By connecting multiple facets of empathy as key mechanisms of information processing with the communication theory of resilience, the present study examines human-AI interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to understand digitally mediated empathy and how the intertwining of empathic and communicative processes of resilience works as coping strategies for COVID-19 disruption. Mixed methods were adopted to explore the using experiences and effects of Replika, a chatbot companion powered by AI, with ethnographic research, in-depth interviews, and grounded theory-based analysis. Findings of this research extend empathy theories from interpersonal communication to human-AI interactions and show five types of digitally mediated empathy among Chinese female Replika users with varying degrees of cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and empathic response involved in the information processing processes, i.e., companion buddy, responsive diary, emotion-handling program, electronic pet, and tool for venting. When processing information obtained from AI and collaborative interactions with the AI chatbot, multiple facets of mediated empathy become unexpected pathways to resilience and enhance users' well-being. This study fills the research gap by exploring empathy and resilience processes in human-AI interactions. Practical implications, especially for increasing individuals' psychological resilience as an important component of global recovery from the pandemic, suggestions for future chatbot design, and future research directions are also discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103074

Cites

94 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 94 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Guo, 2020, Emotional health status and social mentality of the Chinese general public during the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia pandemic, Science & Technology Review, 38, 68
  2. Sawyier, 1975, A conceptual analysis of empathy, Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 37
  3. Wilkinson, 2022, The people in intimate relationships with AI Chatbots, VICE

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Pian, W.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Pian, Wenjing
ORCID
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
103074
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
DOI
10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103074
PMC
PMC9428597
OpenAlex
W4293745145
Cited by
165
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
FWCI
25.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904028)
  • National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (18ZDA307)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
chatbots, human-AI interaction, psychological resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, Replika, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, female users, mental health, coping strategies, chatbot design, Chinese users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review