The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
Chatbot as an emergency exist: Mediated empathy for resilience via human-AI interaction during the COVID-19 pandemic
Open accessAbstract
As a global health crisis, the COVID-19 pandemic has also made heavy mental and emotional tolls become shared experiences of global communities, especially among females who were affected more by the pandemic than males for anxiety and depression. By connecting multiple facets of empathy as key mechanisms of information processing with the communication theory of resilience, the present study examines human-AI interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic in order to understand digitally mediated empathy and how the intertwining of empathic and communicative processes of resilience works as coping strategies for COVID-19 disruption. Mixed methods were adopted to explore the using experiences and effects of Replika, a chatbot companion powered by AI, with ethnographic research, in-depth interviews, and grounded theory-based analysis. Findings of this research extend empathy theories from interpersonal communication to human-AI interactions and show five types of digitally mediated empathy among Chinese female Replika users with varying degrees of cognitive empathy, affective empathy, and empathic response involved in the information processing processes, i.e., companion buddy, responsive diary, emotion-handling program, electronic pet, and tool for venting. When processing information obtained from AI and collaborative interactions with the AI chatbot, multiple facets of mediated empathy become unexpected pathways to resilience and enhance users' well-being. This study fills the research gap by exploring empathy and resilience processes in human-AI interactions. Practical implications, especially for increasing individuals' psychological resilience as an important component of global recovery from the pandemic, suggestions for future chatbot design, and future research directions are also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While these developments have sparked widespread public and academic interest, empirical studies on the mechanisms through which users form emotional connections with chatbots remain limited.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Saldaña, J. (2025) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036235611 · Cited by 19,193
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches
Caldas, M. (2003) · Revista de Administração Contemporânea · doi:10.1590/s1415-65552003000100015 · Cited by 18,688
The Psychological Impact of Quarantine and How to Reduce It: Rapid Review of the Evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3532534 · Cited by 16,394
The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence
Brooks, S. K., Webster, R. K., Smith, L. E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G. J. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30460-8 · Cited by 16,378
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012) · APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. · doi:10.1037/13620-004 · Cited by 10,299
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851
Santomauro, D. F., Mantilla Herrera, A. M., Shadid, J., Zheng, P., Ashbaugh, C., Pigott, D. M., Abbafati, C., Adolph, C., Amlag, J. O., Aravkin, A. Y., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02143-7 · Cited by 5,444
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,712
Ethnography: Principles in Practice
Stebbins, R. A., Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1985) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340052 · Cited by 4,082
The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays
Dillon, W. S. (1974) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · Cited by 3,555
The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007) · SAGE · doi:10.4135/9781848607941 · Cited by 2,798
Mattley, C. L., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2655359 · Cited by 2,412
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Mark, G., Fussell, S. R., Lampe, C., Schraefel, M., Hourcade, J., Appert, C., & Wigdor, D. J. (2017) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453 · Cited by 2,222
Nass, C., Steuer, J., & Tauber, E. R. (1994) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/191666.191703 · Cited by 2,148
Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(2020) · doi:10.1145/3313831 · Cited by 1,951
Emotions, cognition, and behavior
Izard, C. E., Kagan, J., & Zajonc, R. B. (1984) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 1,347
The QCAE: a questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy
Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528484 · Cited by 961
My Chatbot Companion - a Study of Human-Chatbot Relationships
Skjuve, M., Følstad, A., Fostervold, K. I., & Brandtzaeg, P. B. (2021) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102601 · Cited by 797
Cooper, H., Camic, P., Long, D. L., Panter, A., Rindskopf, D., & Sher, K. (2012) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/13620-000 · Cited by 733
A New Chatbot for Customer Service on Social Media
Xu, A., Liu, Z., Guo, Y., Sinha, V. S., & Akkiraju, R. (2017) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025496 · Cited by 627
Unique and Interactive Effects of Empathy and Social Status on Involvement in Bullying
Caravita, S. C. S., Blasio, P. D., & Salmivalli, C. (2008) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00465.x · Cited by 590
Pfattheicher, S., Nockur, L., BOHM, R. M., Sassenrath, C., & Petersen, M. B. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620964422 · Cited by 576
Resilience: Talking, Resisting, and Imagining New Normalcies Into Being
Buzzanell, P. M. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01469.x · Cited by 488
Should Machines Express Sympathy and Empathy? Experiments with a Health Advice Chatbot
Liu, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2018) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0110 · Cited by 447
Curtis, W. J., & Cicchetti, D. (2003) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579403000373 · Cited by 396
Interaction of affect and cognition in empathy.
Hoffman, M. L. (1985) · Cited by 390
Altruism and helping behavior : social, personality, and developmental perspectives
Rushton, J. P., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 389
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
(2001) · doi:10.1145/365024 · Cited by 354
Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations
Brandtzaeg, P. B., & Følstad, A. (2018) · Interactions · doi:10.1145/3236669 · Cited by 322
Savoring, resilience, and psychological well-being in older adults
Smith, J. L., & Hollinger-Smith, L. M. (2014) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2014.986647 · Cited by 319
Resilience: A Literature Review
Martin-Breen, P., & Anderies, J. M. (2011) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 302
Women are most affected by pandemics - lessons from past outbreaks
Wenham, C., Smith, J., Davies, S. E., Feng, H., Grépin, K. A., Harman, S., Herten-Crabb, A., & Morgan, R. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-020-02006-z · Cited by 301
Nambisan, P. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2010-000058 · Cited by 297
The indirect impact of COVID-19 on women
Burki, T. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30568-5 · Cited by 297
A Computational Approach to Understanding Empathy Expressed in Text-Based Mental Health Support
Sharma, A., Miner, A., Atkins, D., & Althoff, T. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.425 · Cited by 268
Custance, D. M., & Mayer, J. (2012) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-012-0510-1 · Cited by 244
Empathy: Its Nature and Limitations
Buie, D. H. (1981) · Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association · doi:10.1177/000306518102900201 · Cited by 213
Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying
Topçu, Ç., & Erdur‐Baker, Ö. (2012) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034312446882 · Cited by 206
Pian, W., Chi, J., & Ma, F. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102713 · Cited by 198
Self-citationEmotional Resilience in the Helping Professions and how it can be Enhanced
Grant, L., & Kinman, G. (2014) · Health and Social Care Education · doi:10.11120/hsce.2014.00040 · Cited by 198
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Person-Centered Messages and Social Support Outcomes
High, A. C., & Dillard, J. P. (2012) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.598208 · Cited by 192
Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy
Keysers, C., & Gazzola, V. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.011 · Cited by 172
Lucas, K., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2012) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2012.687196 · Cited by 146
Todd, A. R., & Burgmer, P. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031999 · Cited by 145
The multiple facets of empathy: a survey of theory and evidence
Leiberg, S., & Anders, S. (2006) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56023-6 · Cited by 134
Health Chatbots for Fighting COVID-19: a Scoping Review
Almalki, M., & Azeez, F. K. (2020) · Acta Informatica Medica · doi:10.5455/aim.2020.28.241-247 · Cited by 129
The positive side of interpersonal communication
Socha, T. J., & Pitts, M. J. (2012) · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) · Cited by 129
Research as Pragmatic Problem-solving: The Pragmatist Roots of Empirically-grounded Theorizing
Strübing, J. (2007) · The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4135/9781848607941.n27 · Cited by 124
Huber, A., Barber, A. L. A., Faragó, T., Müller, C. A., & Huber, L. (2017) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-017-1092-8 · Cited by 123
Nicovich, S. G., Boller, G. W., & Cornwell, T. B. (2006) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00243.x · Cited by 122
Grondin, F., Lomanowska, A. M., & Jackson, P. L. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1111/cpsp.12298 · Cited by 119
Sassenrath, C., Hodges, S. D., & Pfattheicher, S. (2016) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416659253 · Cited by 106
Online Social Connection as a Buffer of Health Anxiety and Isolation During COVID-19
Stuart, J., O'Donnell, K., O'Donnell, A., Scott, R., & Barber, B. (2021) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0645 · Cited by 105
Family burden, family health and personal mental health
Ennis, E., & Bunting, B. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-255 · Cited by 95
Building community resilience on social media to help recover from the COVID-19 pandemic
Xie, L., Pinto, J., & Zhong, B. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107294 · Cited by 92
Communicative Reconstruction of Resilience Labor: Identity/Identification in Disaster-Relief Workers
Agarwal, V., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2015) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2015.1083602 · Cited by 89
Effects of Resilience on Mental Health and Life Satisfaction
Samani, S., Joukar, B., & Sahragard, N. (2007) · Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology · Cited by 87
Resilience in the age of COVID-19
Kaye‐Kauderer, H., Feingold, J. H., Feder, A., Southwick, S. M., & Charney, D. S. (2021) · BJPsych Advances · doi:10.1192/bja.2021.5 · Cited by 86
Buzzanell, P. M., & Houston, J. B. (2018) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2017.1412086 · Cited by 85
Anxious China: Inner Revolution and Politics of Psychotherapy
Zhang, L. (2020) · Cited by 84
Media Niche of Electronic Communication Channels in Friendship: A Meta-Analysis
Liu, D., & Yang, C. (2016) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/jcc4.12175 · Cited by 82
Mey, G. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-45155-4_18 · Cited by 80
Resilience and Empathy as Predictors of Psychological Wellbeing among Adolescents
Vinayak, S., & Judge, J. (2018) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Research · Cited by 79
Gartner, M. C. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.042 · Cited by 67
Online Support Groups for Depression in China: Culturally Shaped Interactions and Motivations
Zhang, R., Eschler, J., & Reddy, M. C. (2018) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-018-9322-4 · Cited by 63
Lillie, H. M., Venetis, M. K., & Chernichky-Karcher, S. M. (2017) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1372049 · Cited by 63
Pleasing frowns, disappointing smiles: An ERP investigation of counterempathy.
Yamada, M., Lamm, C., & Decety, J. (2011) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0023854 · Cited by 60
Paul, I., Mohanty, S., & Sengupta, R. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107036 · Cited by 50
Curran, M. T., Gordon, J., Lin, L., Sridhar, P., & Chuang, J. (2019) · International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300844 · Cited by 50
Lillie, H. M., Chernichky-Karcher, S. M., & Venetis, M. K. (2021) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/02654075211009302 · Cited by 48
The Milspouse Battle Rhythm: Communicating Resilience Throughout the Deployment Cycle
Villagran, M. M., Canzona, M. R., & Ledford, C. J. W. (2013) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.800441 · Cited by 47
Ledbetter, A. M., & Beck, S. J. (2014) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2014.908196 · Cited by 46
Martingano, A. J., & Konrath, S. (2022) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2021.1985415 · Cited by 44
Rossetto, K. R. (2015) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2015.1043737 · Cited by 41
The RoPE Scale: a Measure of How Empathic a Robot is Perceived
Charrier, L., Rieger, A., Galdeano, A., Cordier, A., Lefort, M., & Hassas, S. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673082 · Cited by 41
Afifi, T. D., Granger, D. A., Joseph, A., Denes, A., & Aldeis, D. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650213509665 · Cited by 40
Communication and resilience: concluding thoughts and key issues for future research
Houston, J. B., & Buzzanell, P. M. (2018) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2018.1426691 · Cited by 40
Communicating Hope and Resilience Across the Lifespan
Beck, G. A., & Socha, T. J. (2015) · doi:10.3726/978-1-4539-1520-2 · Cited by 35
The Family communication sourcebook
(2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2398 · Cited by 33
Carr, K., & Wang, T. R. (2012) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2011.629970 · Cited by 30
The Dyadic Communicative Resilience Scale (DCRS): scale development, reliability, and validity
Chernichky-Karcher, S. M., Venetis, M. K., & Lillie, H. M. (2019) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-019-04763-8 · Cited by 30
van der Stouwe, T., Asscher, J. J., Hoeve, M., van der Laan, P. H., & Stams, G. J. J. M. (2018) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.006 · Cited by 27
Beck, G. A. (2016) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1080/15267431.2016.1215315 · Cited by 27
Qualitative Research and the Modern Library
Goodman, V. D. (2011) · Chandos Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1533/9781780632681 · Cited by 27
Chebat, J., Vercollier, S. D., & Gélinas‐Chebat, C. (2003) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3.997 · Cited by 26
The Many Faces of Empathy in Experiential, Person-Centered, Collaborative Assessment
Finn, S. E. (2008) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890802483391 · Cited by 24
EEG based functional connectivity analysis of human pain empathy towards humans and robots
Chang, W., Wang, H., Yan, G., Lü, Z., Liu, C., & Hua, C. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107695 · Cited by 17
Perspective Taking and Avatar-Self Merging
Müsseler, J., von Salm-Hoogstraeten, S., & Böffel, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.714464 · Cited by 16
Resilience, Empathy, and Wellbeing in the Health Professions: An Educational Imperative
Haramati, A., & Weissinger, P. A. (2015) · Global Advances in Health and Medicine · doi:10.7453/gahmj.2015.092 · Cited by 14
Approaches to reviewing the literature in grounded theory: a framework
Deering, K., & Williams, J. (2020) · Nurse Researcher · doi:10.7748/nr.2020.e1752 · Cited by 8
Development and Validation of the Counter-Empathy Scale
Jie, J., & Wang, Y. (2022) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.1177/00332941221076775 · Cited by 6
Empathizers and systemizers process social information differently
Riekki, T. J. J., Svedholm‐Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2017) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2017.1368700 · Cited by 5
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Guo, 2020, Emotional health status and social mentality of the Chinese general public during the 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia pandemic, Science & Technology Review, 38, 68
- Sawyier, 1975, A conceptual analysis of empathy, Annual of Psychoanalysis, 3, 37
- Wilkinson, 2022, The people in intimate relationships with AI Chatbots, VICE
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ma, X., & Huo, Y. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102362 · Cited by 386
Pentina, I., Xie, T., Hancock, T. D., & Bailey, A. A. (2023) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21853 · Cited by 214
Finding love in algorithms: deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots
Li, H. Z., & Zhang, R. (2024) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmae015 · Cited by 186
Finding Love in Algorithms: Deciphering the Emotional Contexts of Close Encounters with AI Chatbots
Li, H., & Zhang, R. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/xd4k7 · Cited by 150
Zhang, R., Li, H., Meng, H., Zhan, J., Gan, H., & Lee, Y.-C. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713429 · Cited by 123
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Q., Zhang, Y., & Pian, W.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pian, Wenjing
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 103074
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- PMC
- PMC9428597
- OpenAlex
- W4293745145
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71904028)
- National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences (18ZDA307)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- chatbots, human-AI interaction, psychological resilience, COVID-19 pandemic, Replika, cognitive empathy, affective empathy, female users, mental health, coping strategies, chatbot design, Chinese users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review