Cited by 15Sex and Gender in HealthcareEthics and Social Impacts of AIAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Gender and sex bias in COVID-19 epidemiological data through the lens of causality

Open access
Díaz-Rodríguez, Natalia, Binkytė, Rūta, Bakkali, Wafae, Bookseller, Sannidhi, Tubaro, Paola, Bacevičius, Andrius, Zhioua, Sami, Chatila, Raja·2023·Information Processing & Management

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has spurred a large amount of experimental and observational studies reporting clear correlation between the risk of developing severe COVID-19 (or dying from it) and whether the individual is male or female. This paper is an attempt to explain the supposed male vulnerability to COVID-19 using a causal approach. We proceed by identifying a set of confounding and mediating factors, based on the review of epidemiological literature and analysis of sex-dis-aggregated data. Those factors are then taken into consideration to produce explainable and fair prediction and decision models from observational data. The paper outlines how non-causal models can motivate discriminatory policies such as biased allocation of the limited resources in intensive care units (ICUs). The objective is to anticipate and avoid disparate impact and discrimination, by considering causal knowledge and causal-based techniques to compliment the collection and analysis of observational big-data. The hope is to contribute to more careful use of health related information access systems for developing fair and robust predictive models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103276

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Geiger D. Pearl J. On the logic of causal models Machine intelligence and pattern recognition. Vol. 9 1990 Elsevier 3 14
  2. Grzelak L. Velay A. Madec Y. Gallais F. Staropoli I. Schmidt-Mutter C. Sex differences in the decline of neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 2020 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press MedRxiv
  3. Head J.R. Andrejko K. Cheng Q. Collender P.A. Phillips S. Boser A. The effect of school closures and reopening strategies on COVID-19 infection dynamics in the San Francisco Bay Area: a cross-sectional survey and modeling analysis 2020 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press MedRxiv
  4. Pearl, J. (2001). Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the seventeenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence (pp. 411–420).
  5. Pearl J. Causality 2009 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
  6. Zietz M. Tatonetti N.P. Testing the association between blood type and COVID-19 infection, intubation, and death 2020 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Preprints MedRxiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Binkytė, R., Bakkali, W., Bookseller, S., Tubaro, P., Bacevičius, A., Zhioua, S., & Chatila, R.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
  • Amazon (United States) (US)
  • École Pour l'Informatique et les Techniques Avancées (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • OSE Immunotherapeutics (France) (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
Corresponding author
Binkytė, Rūta
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
103276
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W4315652684
Cited by
15
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5
FWCI
3.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
ERC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, sex bias, causal inference, confounding factors, mediation analysis, sex-disaggregated data, indirect discrimination, algorithmic discrimination, health data access

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review