The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the care burden of women and families
Open accessAbstract
While women were already doing most of the world’s unpaid care work prior to the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, emerging research suggests that the crisis and its subsequent shutdown response have resulted in a dramatic increase in this burden. It is likely that the negative impacts for women and families will last for years without proactive interventions. What we commonly refer to as “the economy” would not function without the (often unrecognized) foundation of work provided by the “care economy”: the reproduction of everyday life through cooking, raising children, and so forth. The paid economy has slowed not only because people are physically not allowed into workplaces, but also because many families currently need to raise and educate their children without institutional support, which is reducing remunerated working hours and increasing stress. It has long been recognized that gross domestic product ignores the care economy and heterodox economists have promoted alternative economic systems that could value care work and facilitate a fairer sharing of domestic labor while promoting environmental and economic sustainability. This policy brief builds on recent work on the care economy to explore implications of the COVID-19 pandemic and opportunities for addressing the burden of unpaid care work.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presence of children in the household had a detrimental effect on resilience.
“We found that, as with other studies [60], the presence of children in the household had a detrimental effect.”
From Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model (2021) · cites this paper as [60]
Cites
Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy
Folbre, N. (2006) · Journal of Human Development · doi:10.1080/14649880600768512 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model
Panzeri, A., Bertamini, M., Butter, S., Levita, L., Gibson-Miller, J., Vidotto, G., Bentall, R. P., & Bennett, K. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256041 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
“We found that, as with other studies [60], the presence of children in the household had a detrimental effect.”
ResultDolce, V., Vayre, E., Molino, M., & Ghislieri, C. (2020) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci9110196 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Healthcare workers’ burn-out, hopelessness, fear of COVID-19 and perceived social support levels
Karagöl, A., & Törenli Kaya, Z. (2022) · The European Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.ejpsy.2022.01.001 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Johnson, L. (2021) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-021-04234-1 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Gender and sex bias in COVID-19 epidemiological data through the lens of causality
Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Binkytė, R., Bakkali, W., Bookseller, S., Tubaro, P., Bacevičius, A., Zhioua, S., & Chatila, R. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103276 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Beaulieu, M., Bertrand, K., Tremblay, J., Lemaitre, A., & Jauffret-Roustide, M. (2024) · Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy · doi:10.1080/09687637.2023.2247541 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Keefer, A., Perrin, J., Singh, V., Holingue, C., Winchell, S., & Vasa, R. A. (2024) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsad093 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Power, K.
- Affiliations
- Independent Researcher and Consultant, Hamburg, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Power, Kate
- Venue
- Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-06-21
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 1548-7733 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035961329
- Cited by
- 1,064
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 51 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 219 · 2022: 273 · 2021: 276 · 2020: 35
- FWCI
- 287.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability Science Practice and Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, unpaid care work, caregiver burden, women, family, care economy, domestic work, gender inequality, GDP measurement, heterodox economics, child care, economic impact of pandemic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review