Cited by 36Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataRecommender Systems and TechniquesPrivacy, Security, and Data Protection

Matrix factorization recommender based on adaptive Gaussian differential privacy for implicit feedback

Open access
Liu, Hanyang, Wang, Yong, Zhang, Zhiqiang, Deng, Jiangzhou, Chen, Chao, Zhang, Leo Yu·2024·Information Processing & Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103720

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Deng, J., Chen, C., & Zhang, L. Y.
Affiliations
  • Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yong
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
61
Issue
4
Pages
103720
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
OpenAlex
W4393038469
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 4
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Keywords
matrix factorization, differential privacy, Gaussian differential privacy, implicit feedback, privacy-preserving recommendation, adaptive clipping, Bayesian Personalized Ranking, gradient perturbation, recommender systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review