The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyber security risk assessment for SCADA and DCS networks
Abstract
The growing dependence of critical infrastructures and industrial automation on interconnected physical and cyber-based control systems has resulted in a growing and previously unforeseen cyber security threat to supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) and distributed control systems (DCSs). It is critical that engineers and managers understand these issues and know how to locate the information they need. This paper provides a broad overview of cyber security and risk assessment for SCADA and DCS, introduces the main industry organizations and government groups working in this area, and gives a comprehensive review of the literature to date. Major concepts related to the risk assessment methods are introduced with references cited for more detail. Included are risk assessment methods such as HHM, IIM, and RFRM which have been applied successfully to SCADA systems with many interdependencies and have highlighted the need for quantifiable metrics. Presented in broad terms is probability risk analysis (PRA) which includes methods such as FTA, ETA, and FEMA. The paper concludes with a general discussion of two recent methods (one based on compromise graphs and one on augmented vulnerability trees) that quantitatively determine the probability of an attack, the impact of the attack, and the reduction in risk associated with a particular countermeasure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“ICS integrity is critical to OT security and the priority is to detect various security events and incidents, such as failure of devices and services exhausting resources early [100].”
From Industrial IoT, Cyber Threats, and Standards Landscape: Evaluation and Roadmap (2021) · cites this paper as [100]
In the citing paper
“Risk assessment methods in general and in the context of SCADA systems specifically are hard to categorise as we con-clude based on our analysis and in agreement with Morgan (2013) and Ralston et al. (2007).”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as Ralston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“An extensive overview of risk assessment meth-odologies is contained in Ralston et al. (2007), but only two methods are examined in detail.”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as Ralston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“As pointed out in Morgan (2013) and Ralston et al. (2007), risk assessment methods as applied to SCADA systems are dif-ficult to categorise.”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as Ralston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“In Cheminod et al. (2013), Patel et al. (2008), Ralston et al. (2007), Taylor et al. (2002), among proba-bilistic tree-based methods for SCADA systems inductive and deductive methods are distinguished.”
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as Ralston et al., 2007
In the citing paper
“In 2007, in Ralston et al. (2007) it was mentioned that a “natural extension to PRA involves the use of fuzzy concepts, though this approach has not been published for use in SCADA system security risk assessment.””
From A review of cyber security risk assessment methods for SCADA systems (2016) · cites this paper as Ralston et al. (2007)
Citations
Cites
On the quantitative definition of risk
Kaplan, S., & Garrick, B. J. (1981) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1981.tb01350.x · Cited by 3,103
Attack trees : Modeling security threats
Schneier, B. (1999) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 635
Risk Modeling, Assessment, And Management
Haimes, Y. Y. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C (Applications and Reviews) · doi:10.1109/tsmcc.1999.760577 · Cited by 627
Probabilistic Risk Assessment and Management for Engineers and Scientists
Kumamoto, H., & Henley, E. J. (1996) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 618
Security issues in SCADA networks
Igure, V. M., Laughter, S. A., & Williams, R. D. (2006) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2006.03.001 · Cited by 566
Modeling and simulating critical infrastructures and their interdependencies
Rinaldi, S. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences/Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.1109/hicss.2004.1265180 · Cited by 431
Introduction to the OCTAVE Approach
Alberts, C., Dorofee, A., Stevens, J. F., & Woody, C. (2003) · doi:10.21236/ada634134 · Cited by 262
Attack Modeling for Information Security and Survivability
Moore, A. P., Ellison, R. J., & Linger, R. C. (2001) · doi:10.1184/r1/6572063.v1 · Cited by 259
Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technology in Countering Terrorism
Cohen, E. A. (2002) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20033374 · Cited by 227
Attack Modeling for Information Security and Survivability
Moore, A. P., Ellison, R. J., & Linger, R. C. (2001) · doi:10.21236/ada387544 · Cited by 226
Flagged first, then by citations
8 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- Smith, 2003, Connection to public communications increases danger of cyber-attacks, Pipeline and Gas Journal, 230, 20
- Watts D. Security & vulnerability in electric power systems. In: 35th North American Power Symposium. 2003. p. 559–66
- Oman P, Schweitzer E, Roberts J. Safeguarding IEDs, substations, and SCADA systems against electronic intrusions. In: Proceedings of the 2001 western power delivery automation conference. 2001. p. 9–12
- Novak, 2005, Merging SCADA and business processes, Plant Engineering, 59, 35
- Asenjo, 2005, Cybersecurity for legacy SCADA systems, Utility Automation and Engineering T&D, 10, 48
- 2005, Battling the cyber menace, PEI Power Engineering International, 13, 123
- SAAD AY. Securing supervisory control and data acquisition systems: Plant utilities: A special report. Hydrocarbon processing (International Ed.) 2002; 81(7); 55–6
- Byres, 2005, Insidious threat to control systems, InTech, 52, 28
- Byres, 2006, Uncovering cyber flaws, InTech, 53, 20
- Carlson, 2005, DHS to state its case to business, Eweek, 42, 20
- 2005, Honeywell reshapes industrial control world, Manufacturing Computer Solutions, 37
- Miller, 2005, Risk assessment: The first step, InTech, 52, 68
- How to do a Complete Automated Risk Assessment: A Methodology Review. Riskwatch White Paper, http://www.riskwatch.com/news/whitepapers/How_To_Do_A_Complete_Automated_Risk_Assessment_10-02RW.pdf; 2002 [accessed 4.1.2006]
- Ezell BC. Thesis/dissertation. University of Virginia: Systems Engineering Department; 1998
- Taylor C, Krings A, Alves-Foss J. Risk analysis and probabilistic survivability assessment (RAPSA): An assessment approach for power substation hardening. In: Proc. ACM workshop on scientific aspects of cyber terrorism. 2002. p. 1–9
- Schneier, 1999, Attack Trees, Dr. Dobb’s Journal, 24, 21
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–278 of 278
A study on optimization of security function for reducing vulnerabilities in SCADA
Kim, S., Eom, J.-H., & Chung, T. (2012) · International Conference on Cyber Security, Cyber Warfare and Digital Forensic (CyberSec) · doi:10.1109/cybersec.2012.6246099 · Cited by 2
A Concise Model to Evaluate Security of SCADA Systems based on Security Standards
Aghajanzadeh, N., & Keshavarz‐Haddad, A. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/19603-1450 · Cited by 2
Water Level Deviation Analysis of Levels Between Two Sides of the Boiler Drum
Xia, F., Quan, Y.-L., Zhang, H., & Peng, D. (2016) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-016-0957-7 · Cited by 2
Cybersecurity Snapshot: Google, Twitter, and Other Online Databases
Rawal, B. S., Eberhardt, G., & Lee, J. (2016) · Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Technology · doi:10.14419/jacst.v5i1.6181 · Cited by 2
Dependence analysis based cyber-physical security assessment for critical infrastructure networks
Liu, X., Zhang, J., & Zhu, P. (2016) · IEEE Annual Information Technology, Electronics and Mobile Communication Conference (IEMCON) · doi:10.1109/iemcon.2016.7746296 · Cited by 2
A Novel Concept of Firewall-Filtering Service Based on Rules Trust-Risk Assessment
Jaïdi, F. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-17065-3_30 · Cited by 2
Viewpoint of Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Artificial Enabled Social Engineering Attacks
Khidzir, N. Z., & Ahmed, S. A.-A.-M. (2018) · Journal of Contemporary Issues and Thought · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3208299 · Cited by 2
Multiple Layers of Fuzzy Logic to Quantify Vulnerabilities in IoT
Shojaeshafiei, M., Etzkorn, L. H., & Anderson, M. (2020) · doi:10.5121/csit.2020.100914 · Cited by 2
Rapid Mission Assurance Assessment via Sociotechnical Modeling and Simulation
Lanham, M. J. (2015) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.20895.66721 · Cited by 2
Application of a financial quantitative risk model to information security risk assessment
Pan, L. (2018) · Cited by 2
Assessing the cyber-security status of the metropolitan municipalities in South Africa.
Mabaso, N. J. (2018) · ResearchSpace (University of KwaZulu-Natal) · Cited by 2
Security in process control systems
Szostak, R. (2009) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives · Cited by 2
Design and Implementation of Microbiological Fermentation Monitoring System
Wang, J., Wang, J., & Liu, S. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-5841-8_18 · Cited by 1
Cybersecurity anatomization and assurance of industrial control systems
Mohapatra, A., & Ramanathan, K. (2022) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0122823 · Cited by 1
Hivre, S. R., Jadhav, S. M., Shahapure, S., Mhatre, S. M., & Kadam, V. J. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Distributed Systems Security (ICBDS) · doi:10.1109/icbds61829.2024.10837349 · Cited by 1
Research on Industrial Control Devices Flaw Discovery Technology
Chen, X., & Li, Q. (2015) · International Conference on Advances in Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Informatics (AMEII) · doi:10.2991/ameii-15.2015.247 · Cited by 1
A SCADA Testbed Implementation Architecture for Security Assessment
Lee, J., Kim, S.-J., & Kang, D.-J. (2010) · Journal of the Korean Institute of Illuminating and Electrical Installation Engineers · doi:10.5207/jieie.2010.24.4.050 · Cited by 1
Generic Software Risk Management Framework for SCADA System
Elhady, A. M., Elfetouh, A. A., El-Bakry, H. M., & Hassan, A. (2013) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/11946-7762 · Cited by 1
Concepto y Enfoques sobre el Análisis y la Gestión Dinámica del Riesgo en Sistemas de Información
López, D., Pastor, Ó., & García, L. J. S. (2012) · Cited by 1
Mendezllovet, E. A. (2010) · Cited by 1
Network Attack Scenario Analysis and Threat Identification
Song, X., Zhao, J., Yuan, H., Li, Z., Zhi, Y., & Zhang, X. (2019) · IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC) · doi:10.1109/imcec46724.2019.8984024 · Cited by 1
Stabilization of Sampled-Data Systems with Noisy Sampling Intervals and False Data Injection Attacks
Wu, X., & Zhao, X. (2024) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc62350.2024.10587938 · Cited by 1
Amadi, C. (2026) · WORLD JOURNAL OF INNOVATION AND MODERN TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.56201/wjimt.v9.no8.2025.pg99.147 · Cited by 1
Network structure for low level control systems designed to prevent cyber attacks
Kuljača, O., Gadewadikar, J., & Horvat, K. (2011) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · Cited by 1
A safety assessment model of industrial control system based on fuzzing synthesis theory
Zou, Z., Wang, X., Li, F., Zhang, J., & Qing, S. (2017) · IEEE Information Technology, Networking, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (ITNEC) · doi:10.1109/itnec.2017.8285031 · Cited by 1
Pogrebna, G., & Skilton, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-13527-0_5 · Cited by 1
Jaïdi, F. (2019) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2019.8766470 · Cited by 1
Consequence-Based Resilient Architectures
Michel, C. S., & Freeman, S. G. (2019) · Advances in information security · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-18214-4_2 · Cited by 1
Liu, X., Kong, X.-M., Zhang, X.-N., Luan, H., Yan, Y. G., Sha, Y. D., Li, K.-L., Cao, X., & Chen, J. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/9248267 · Cited by 1
RetractedStrengthening Cybersecurity Governance: The Impact of Firewalls on Risk Management
Gangineni, V. N., Pabbineedi, S., Penmetsa, M., Bhumireddy, J. R., Chalasani, R., & Tyagadurgam, M. S. V. (2021) · International Journal of AI BigData Computational and Management Studies · doi:10.63282/3050-9416.ijaibdcms-v2i4p106 · Cited by 1
Vitkus, D. (2022) · doi:10.20334/2022-014-m · Cited by 1
Resilient Networked Microgrids Against Unbounded Attacks
Zuo, S., Altun, T., Lewis, F. L., & Davoudi, A. A. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119890881.ch20 · Cited by 1
Riskhan, B., Rahmawati, S., Lee, M., Rashid, N. B. M., Azhari, N. S. B., & Hussain, K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5136845 · Cited by 1
Es-Salhi, K. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/f5707da7z5424z4c88z89e0z9e322d5696b3 · Cited by 1
Network-simulation-based evaluation of smart grid applications
Jin, D. (2013) · Illinois Digital Environment for Access to Learning and Scholarship (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)
Secure web access to mini distributed control system
Rzońca, D., Stec, A., & Trybuś, B. (2012) · Automatyka/Automatics · doi:10.7494/automat.2012.16.2.155
Control and communication for a secure and reconfigurable power distribution system.
Giacomoni, A. M. (2011) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota)
Kunskapsöversikt – Skydd av samhällsviktig verksamhet
Hassel, H., Johansson, J. S., Svegrup, L., & Petersen, K. (2014) · Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Using Neural Network to Propose Solutions to Threats in Attack PatternsPreprint
Adebiyi, A., & Imafidon, C. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1401.6226
Kollaboratives Threat Modeling für Eingebettete Systeme
Köster, C. F. (2012)
Bayındır, R., Sağıroğlu, Ş., Çolak, İ., & Özbilen, A. (2009) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17341/gummfd.25645
Jorge, R., & Félix, B. (2009)
Brundage, M., Mavridou, A., Johnson, J., Hawrylak, P. J., & Papa, M. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2659-1.ch006
Security Communication for AMI on Basis of ECC and ESP
Zhang, X., Tong, W., & Li, Z. (2017) · International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy (CSP) · doi:10.1145/3058060.3058071
Neft-qaz sənayesində kibertəhlükəsizlik problemləri
İmamverdiyev, Y., & Muradova, G. (2018) · İnformasiya təhlükəsizliyinin aktual multidissiplinar elmi-praktiki problemləri respublika konfransı · doi:10.25045/ncinfosec.2018.23
Event-based resilient H∞ fuzzy filter design under DoS attacks
Cheng, Z., Yue, D., Hu, S., & Chen, L. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing and Intelligence Systems (CCIS) · doi:10.1109/ccis.2018.8691367
Analysis of Time Characteristics of MMS Protocol Transmission in Intelligent Substation
Wang, W., Ma, Q., Liu, Y., Lin, L., & Guan, T. (2019) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-9714-1_38
CYBER SECURITY AND DIGITALIZED FINANCIAL SYSTEM: A PARADIGM SHIFT IN GLOBAL MARKET
Mh, A., Hossain, M. S., & Uddin, M. H. (2019) · The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce
Developing a Cybersecurity Risk Analysis System for High-Tech Equipment in Machine Industry
Suloyeva, S., Grishunin, S. V., & Burova, E. (2019) · International Scientific Conference on Innovations in Digital Economy (SPBPU IDE) · doi:10.1145/3372177.3373310
Modeling Stepping Stone Attacks with Constraints in Cyber Infrastructure
Gamarra, M., Shetty, S. S., Nicol, D. M., Njilla, L., & Gonzalez, O. R. (2019) · Globecom · doi:10.1109/globecom38437.2019.9014266
Charfi, S., & Mladenović, M. (2020) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2242-4.ch016
Cyberwarfare – Associated Technologies and Countermeasures
Chelvachandran, N., Kendzierskyj, S., Shah, Y., & Jahankhani, H. (2020) · Advanced sciences and technologies for security applications · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35746-7_2
multiple layers of fuzzy logic to quantify vulnerabilies in iotPreprint
Shojaeshafiei, M., Etzkorn, L. H., & Anderson, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07155
Risk Level Calculation for IoT System
Naik, N. (2021) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-874
MCF-CSA: A Multi-level Collaboration Framework for Cyber Situation Awareness and Information Sharing
Huang, D., & Wang, L. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78621-2_5
Zhang, X., Pan, Y., Li, C., & Wang, Z. (2021) · International Conference on Industrial IoT, Big Data and Supply Chain (IIoTBDSC) · doi:10.1117/12.2624141
Brundage, M., Mavridou, A., Johnson, J., Hawrylak, P. J., & Papa, M. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5942-1.ch017
REVIEW ON INFORMATION SECURITY OF INDUSTRIAL CONTROL SYSTEMS
Wang, M., & Weijie, G. (2019) · EPH - International Journal of Science And Engineering · doi:10.53555/eijse.v5i3.42
CYBERSECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORKS FOR ENGINEERING DATABASES: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWPreprint
Islam, M. T., Islam, T., Mission, M. R., Refat, T. K., & Kynatun, M. (2025) · doi:10.22541/au.175070919.91300935/v1
SSB: Smart Contract Security Detection Tool Suitable for Industrial Control Scenarios
Tao, C., He, S., & Shen, X. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25154695
Ogborigbo, J. C., & Gadah, J. N. (2021) · World Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology and Sciences · doi:10.30574/wjaets.2021.2.2.0021
Kompendium der Methoden und Techniken
Schönberger, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-49390-5_8
Challenges and Future Directions in Quantum-Driven Financial Innovation
Kumar, S., & Велинов, Е. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-2893-5.ch002
Xiaocong, Z., Min, X., liang, M., Chenliang, Y., & Meixuan, W. (2026) · Springer proceedings in physics · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3233-9_4
Adapting Traditional Hazards Analysis Methods to Address Cyber Risks
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Wright, V., Stolworthy, R., Lampe, B., Yockey, W., Youngblood, R., Freeman, S. G., & Everett, C. (2025) · doi:10.2172/3012810
Zou, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, W. J., Ji, Z., & yang, Z. (2026) · Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology · doi:10.1080/20464177.2026.2678632
Adapting Traditional Hazards Analysis Methods to Address Cyber Risks
USDOE Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), Wright, V., USDOE Office of Cybersecurity, E. S., Stolworthy, R., Lampe, B., Yockey, W., Everett, C., Youngblood, R., & Freeman, S. G. (2025) · doi:10.2172/3375117
Dynamic Data Driven Applications Systems (DDDAS) for Cyber Risk Management in Microgrids
Fahmy, M., Mesham, M., Yavuz, A., Darville, J., & Çelik, N. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88574-7_34
Physical Processes, Digital Risks: Component-Level STRIDE Risk Assessment for an Industrial CPS
Sabo, S., Ahmed, C. M., & Ranjan, R. (2026) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-5039-4_5
Prediction of Vulnerabilities in Financial Sector Using Machine Learning
Ali, A., Ali, T., Junaid, M., & Kureshi, N. (2026) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22426-2_9
Amadi, C. (2026) · Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research · doi:10.65150/ep-gjetr/v2e9/2026-12
Securing the Brownfield: A Retrofit-First Framework for OT Cybersecurity in Legacy Process Plants
Okogbenin, K., & Daniel, T. A. (2023) · International Journal of Technology Management and Humanities · doi:10.21590/ijtmh20230904028
Adebayo, A. (2026) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICAL THEORY E-ISSN · doi:10.56201/ijcsmt.vol.11.no8.2025.pg88.134 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ralston, P. A. S., Graham, J. H., & Hieb, J. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ralston, P.A.S.
- ORCID
- Ralston, P.A.S.
- Venue
- ISA Transactions
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-594
- ISSN
- 0019-0578 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050588495
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 12.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ISA Transactions (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Homeland Security
- Furman University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Risk and Safety Analysis
- Keywords
- cybersecurity risk assessment, SCADA systems, distributed control systems, industrial control systems, critical infrastructure, risk assessment methodology, HAZOP, fault tree analysis, event tree analysis, failure mode and effects analysis, attack probability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
