Cited by 196Guidance and Control SystemsAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsAerospace Engineering and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Back-stepping active disturbance rejection control design for integrated missile guidance and control system via reduced-order ESO

Xingling, Shao, Honglun, Wang·2015·ISA Transactions

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel composite integrated guidance and control (IGC) law for missile intercepting against unknown maneuvering target with multiple uncertainties and control constraint. First, by using back-stepping technique, the proposed IGC law design is separated into guidance loop and control loop. The unknown target maneuvers and variations of aerodynamics parameters in guidance and control loop are viewed as uncertainties, which are estimated and compensated by designed model-assisted reduced-order extended state observer (ESO). Second, based on the principle of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC), enhanced feedback linearization (FL) based control law is implemented for the IGC model using the estimates generated by reduced-order ESO. In addition, performance analysis and comparisons between ESO and reduced-order ESO are examined. Nonlinear tracking differentiator is employed to construct the derivative of virtual control command in the control loop. Third, the closed-loop stability for the considered system is established. Finally, the effectiveness of the proposed IGC law in enhanced interception performance such as smooth interception course, improved robustness against multiple uncertainties as well as reduced control consumption during initial phase are demonstrated through simulations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isatra.2015.02.013

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Yan, 2013, Adaptive integrated guidance and control based on backstepping and input-to-state stability, Asian J Control, 1
  2. Dong, 2011, Active disturbance rejection control for an electrostatically actuated MEMS device, J Intel Control Syst, 16, 160

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xingling, S., & Honglun, W.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Honglun, Wang
Venue
ISA Transactions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
57
Pages
10-22
ISSN
0019-0578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008500509
Cited by
196
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 2
FWCI
29.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ISA Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61175084/F030601)
  • Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT 13004)
  • Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (2014ZA51002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Guidance and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems
Keywords
integrated guidance and control, missile intercept, backstepping control, active disturbance rejection control, reduced-order extended state observer, feedback linearization, nonlinear tracking differentiator, input constraints, robustness to uncertainty, closed-loop stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review