Cited by 105Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsChaos control and synchronization

Fixed-time adaptive neural network control for nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with deadzone and output constraint

Ni, Junkang, Wu, Zhonghua, Liu, Ling, Liu, Chongxin·2020·ISA Transactions

Abstract

This paper considers fixed-time control problem of nonstrict-feedback nonlinear system subjected to deadzone and output constraint. First, tan-type Barrier Lyapunov function (BLF) is constructed to keep system output within constraint. Next, unknown nonlinear function is approximated by radial basis function neural network (RBFNN). Using the property of Gaussian radial basis function, the upper bound of the term containing the unknown nonlinear function is derived and the updating law is proposed to estimate the square of the norm of the neural network weights. Then, virtual control inputs are developed using backstepping design and their derivatives are obtained by fixed-time differentiator. Finally, the actual control input is designed based on deadzone inverse approach. Lyapunov stability analysis shows that the presented method guarantees fixed-time convergence of the tracking error to a small neighborhood around zero while all the other closed-loop signals keep bounded. The presented control strategy addresses algebraic-loop problem, overcomes explosion of complexity and reduces the number of adaptation parameters, which is easy to be implemented with less computation burden. The presented control scheme is applied to academic system, real electromechanical system and aircraft longitudinal system and simulation results demonstrate its effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.07.013

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ni, J., Wu, Z., Liu, L., & Liu, C.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern Polytechnical University (CN)
  • Henan Polytechnic University (CN)
  • State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment (CN)
Corresponding author
Ni, Junkang
Venue
ISA Transactions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
97
Pages
458-473
ISSN
0019-0578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963248885
Cited by
105
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ISA Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Chaos control and synchronization
Keywords
fixed-time control, nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems, dead zone, output constraints, barrier Lyapunov function, radial basis function neural network, adaptive neural network control, backstepping control, explosion of complexity, electromechanical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review