Cited by 29Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFault Detection and Control Systems

Adaptive fault-tolerant control for a class of nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems with unmodeled dynamics and dead-zone output using multi-dimensional taylor networks

Kharrat, Mohamed·2024·Nonlinear Dynamics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11071-024-09749-8

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kharrat, M.
Affiliations
Jouf University (SA)
Corresponding author
Kharrat, Mohamed
Venue
Nonlinear Dynamics
Published
2024-05-31
Volume
112
Issue
15
Pages
13289-13306
ISSN
  • 0924-090X (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-269X
OpenAlex
W4399208777
Cited by
29
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nonlinear Dynamics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
adaptive fault-tolerant control, nonstrict-feedback nonlinear systems, unmodeled dynamics, actuator faults, multi-dimensional Taylor network, semi-global uniform ultimate boundedness, single-link manipulator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review