Cited by 102Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques

Multiclass feature learning for hyperspectral image classification: Sparse and hierarchical solutions

Open access
Tuia, Devis, Flamary, Rémi, Courty, Nicolas·2015·ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.006

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Early studies concerning LULC classification based on deep learning mostly focused on feature representation or learning, while the final classification used other simpler classifiers.

    “Early studies concerning LULC classification based on DL mostly focused on feature representation or learning, while the final classification used other simpler classifiers (Tuia et al., 2015).”

    From Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review (2019) · cites this paper as Tuia et al., 2015

    The Abstract (p. 1) describes learned spatial features paired with a simple multiclass logistic classifier, and the Introduction (pp. 2–3) identifies its hierarchical feature-extraction model as a deep model for land-cover and land-use classification. This makes the paper an example of the approach described, but it does not establish that early deep-learning studies mostly followed that pattern. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Camps-Valls, G., Tuia, D., Bruzzone, L., Benediktsson, J. A., 2014. Advances in hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Signal Proc. Mag. 31, 45-54.
  2. Moser, G., Serpico, S. B., Benediktsson, J. A., 2013. Land-cover mapping by Markov modeling of spatial-contextual information. Proc. IEEE 101 (3), 631-651.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuia, D., Flamary, R., & Courty, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Université de Bretagne Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Tuia, Devis
Venue
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
105
Pages
272-285
ISSN
0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063102607
Cited by
102
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 7
FWCI
24.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
Swiss National Science Foundation (PP00P2_150593)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Keywords
hyperspectral image classification, sparse feature learning, hierarchical feature learning, nonlinear classification, urban land cover classification, multimodal data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review