Cited by 1,951Remote-Sensing Image ClassificationRemote Sensing and Land UseRemote Sensing in Agriculture

EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classification

Helber, Patrick, Bischke, Benjamin, Dengel, Andreas, Borth, Damian·2019·IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing

Abstract

In this paper, we present a patch-based land use and land cover classification approach using Sentinel-2 satellite images. The Sentinel-2 satellite images are openly and freely accessible, and are provided in the earth observation program Copernicus. We present a novel dataset, based on these images that covers 13 spectral bands and is comprised of ten classes with a total of 27 000 labeled and geo-referenced images. Benchmarks are provided for this novel dataset with its spectral bands using state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks. An overall classification accuracy of 98.57% was achieved with the proposed novel dataset. The resulting classification system opens a gate toward a number of earth observation applications. We demonstrate how this classification system can be used for detecting land use and land cover changes, and how it can assist in improving geographical maps. The geo-referenced dataset EuroSAT is made publicly available at https://github.com/phelber/eurosat.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jstars.2019.2918242

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors of Helber et al. (2019) achieve 98.56% accuracy on EUROSAT using solely RGB channels as input to ResNet50.

    “the authors of Helber et al. (2019) achieve very high accuracy on EUROSAT, i.e. 98.56% using solely the RGB channels as input to a ResNet50 model.”

    From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Helber et al. (2019)

  • Helber et al. (2019) show that one can achieve >90% accuracy on EUROSAT using only one band, making multispectral information redundant.

    “Moreover, their experiments show that one can achieve very high accuracy >90% while using only one band making the multispectral information redundant.”

    From Benchmarking and scaling of deep learning models for land cover image classification (2023) · cites this paper as Helber et al. (2019)

  • The overall coarse-to-fine-grain classifier reaches performances on par with Helber et al. [35], where the authors reached a 98.57% overall accuracy using a ResNet-50-based model.

    “reaching performances on par with Helber et al. [35], where the authors reached a 98.57% of overall accuracy, by using a model based on the ResNet-50.”
  • The experimental dataset is EuroSAT, a dataset of Sentinel-2 satellite images covering 13 spectral bands and consisting of ten classes with in total 27000 labeled and georeferenced images.

    “The experimental dataset under consideration is the”
  • The architecture proposed in this article is extremely less complex than the one proposed in [35], since ResNet-50 is composed of 50 layers while the proposed one is composed of six layers only: five classical and one quantum.

    “the architecture proposed in this article is extremely less complex than the one proposed in [35], since the ResNet-50 is composed of 50 layers, while the proposed one is composed of six layers only: five classical and one quantum.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Helber, P., Bischke, B., Dengel, A., & Borth, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Kaiserslautern (DE)
  • University of St.Gallen (CH)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
Published
2019-07
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
2217-2226
ISSN
  • 1939-1404 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-1535
OpenAlex
W2964194231
Cited by
1,951
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 430 · 2025: 505 · 2024: 352 · 2023: 257 · 2022: 167 · 2021: 140 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 4
FWCI
67.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing (publishedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (acceptedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • BMBF Project DeFuseNN (01IW17002)
  • Nvidia (xxx)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Remote Sensing and Land Use
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Keywords
land use and land cover classification, EuroSAT dataset, Sentinel-2, satellite imagery, deep learning benchmark, convolutional neural networks, patch-based classification, geo-referenced images, Copernicus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review