Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Ideation Among Transgender Youth in California: Findings From a Representative, Population-Based Sample of High School Students

Open access
Perez-Brumer, Amaya, Day, Jack K., Russell, Stephen T., Hatzenbuehler, Mark L.·2017·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
DOI 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective No representative population-based studies of youth in the US exist on gender identity-related disparities in suicidal ideation or on factors that underlie this disparity. To address this, we: (1) examined gender identity-related disparities in the prevalence of suicidal ideation; (2) evaluated whether established psychosocial factors explained these disparities; and (3) identified correlates of suicidal ideation among all youth and stratified by gender identity. Method Data were derived from the 2013–2015 California Healthy Kids Survey (CHKS; N=621,189) and a weighted subsample representative of the Californian student population (Biennial Statewide California Student Survey [CSS; N = 28,856]). Results Prevalence of past 12-month self-reported suicidal ideation was nearly twice as high for transgender compared to non-transgender youth (33.73% versus 18.85%; χ2 = 35.48, p <.001). In fully adjusted models within the representative sample, transgender youth had 2.99 higher odds (95% CI: 2.25, 3.98) of reporting past-year suicidal ideation compared to non-transgender youth. Among transgender youth, only depressive symptoms (AOR: 5.44, 95% CI:1.81, 16.38) and victimization (AOR: 2.66, 95 CI%: 1.26, 5.65) remained significantly associated with higher odds of suicidal ideation in fully adjusted models. In multiple mediation analyses, depression attenuated the association between gender identity and suicidal ideation by 17.95%, and victimization by 14.71%. Conclusion This study uses the first representative population-based sample of youth in the US that includes a measure of gender identity to report on gender identity-related disparities in suicidal ideation and to identify potential mechanisms underlying this disparity in a representative sample.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Perez-Brumer, A., Day, J. K., Russell, S. T., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
739-746
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010
OpenAlex
W2732554830
Cited by
271
References
11
FWCI
37.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Ideation Among Transgender Youth in California: Findings From a Representative, Population-Based Sample of High School Students. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010
The paper
Perez-Brumer, A., Day, J. K., Russell, S. T., & Hatzenbuehler, M. L. (2017). Prevalence and Correlates of Suicidal Ideation Among Transgender Youth in California: Findings From a Representative, Population-Based Sample of High School Students. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2017.06.010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.