Cited by 6Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Emotional and behavioral problem profiles of preteens with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: a multicultural study

Open access
Ayer, Lynsay, Ohana, Elie, Ivanova, Masha Y., Frering, Hannah E., Achenbach, Thomas M., Althoff, Robert R.·2024·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB) among preteen children have risen to the attention of researchers, practitioners, and policymakers. To shed light on potential treatment/prevention targets, we sought to identify empirically derived emotional and behavioral problem profiles of preteens with SITB, and to determine whether these profiles differ by age, gender and society.Method Caregivers of 46,719 children aged 6 to 12 years from 42 societies across the world completed the Child Behavior Checklist for ages 6-18 (CBCL/6-18). There were 1,656 children whose caregivers indicated that their child experienced SITB. We conducted a latent profile analysis (LPA) using scores from eight CBCL/6-18 problem scales to derive problem profiles of children with SITB. Multilevel modelling was used to estimate differences in the profiles by SITB, society, sex, and age.Results A 4-profile model provided the best fit to the data, with profiles reflecting low problems (39.7%), mild problems (42.6%), moderate problems (15.4%), and rule-breaking/thought problems (2.3%). The low problems profile had CBCL problem scale scores nearly indistinguishable from those of children without SITB. Children in the rule-breaking/thought problems group were mostly female, whereas children in the other profile groups were mostly male. Children with the rule-breaking/thought problems profile also were most likely to have both suicidal thoughts and self-harm behaviors.Plain language summary In this study, authors analyzed emotional and behavioral profile of preteens who experienced self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITB). Caregivers of over 46,000 children aged 6-12 from 42 countries completed the Child Behavior Checklist. The authors found that most preteens with SITB had low levels of other mental health problems. This study highlights the needs to screen all children for SITBs, not just those who have have significant mental health problems.Conclusion Problem profiles of preteens with SITB are heterogeneous, with most having relatively low levels of other psychopathology. Selectively screening only children with clinically significant mental health problems for suicidal thoughts and self-harm behaviors (eg, asking about suicidal thoughts only among children with depression) risks missing many children experiencing SITB.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.11.012

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of clear suicide-risk markers in preadolescents that might otherwise make targeted suicide-risk screening more effective.

    “the lack of clear suicide-risk markers in preadolescents5 that might otherwise make targeted suicide-risk screening more effective.”

    From Asking Preadolescents About Suicide Is Not Associated With Increased Suicidal Thoughts (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Discussion reports that 82% of preteens with self-injurious thoughts and behaviors had low or mild caregiver-rated problem profiles, and says screening only children with clinically significant mental health problems would miss many cases. It recommends universal screening rather than making screening contingent on those problems. This supports a limitation of targeted screening based on mental-health indicators, but not the broader assertion that preadolescents lack clear suicide-risk markers generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ayer, L., Ohana, E., Ivanova, M. Y., Frering, H. E., Achenbach, T. M., & Althoff, R. R.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Ayer, Lynsay
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
63
Issue
9
Pages
931-942
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391188839
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1R21MH128522)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, preadolescents, suicidal ideation, self-harm, Child Behavior Checklist, cross-cultural comparison, gender differences, age differences, child mental health screening, rule violations
MeSH terms
Problem Behavior, Child, Child Behavior, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Female, Humans, Male, Self-Injurious Behavior, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review