Cited by 294Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsOvarian function and disordersDermatology and Skin Diseases

The effect of a high-protein, low glycemic-load diet versus a conventional, high glycemic-load diet on biochemical parameters associated with acne vulgaris: a randomized, investigator-masked, controlled trial

Smith, Robyn N., Mann, Neil J., Braue, Anna, Mäkeläinen, Henna, Varigos, George A.·2007·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background No previous study has sought to examine the influence of dietary composition on acne vulgaris. Objective We sought to compare the effect of an experimental low glycemic-load diet with a conventional high glycemic-load diet on clinical and endocrine aspects of acne vulgaris. Methods A total of 43 male patients with acne completed a 12-week, parallel, dietary intervention study with investigator-masked dermatology assessments. Primary outcomes measures were changes in lesion counts, sex hormone binding globulin, free androgen index, insulin-like growth factor-I, and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Results At 12 weeks, total lesion counts had decreased more in the experimental group (-21.9 [95% confidence interval, -26.8 to -19.0]) compared with the control group (-13.8 [-19.1 to -8.5], P = .01). The experimental diet also reduced weight (P = .001), reduced the free androgen index (P = .04), and increased insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (P = .001) when compared with a high glycemic-load diet. Limitations We could not preclude the role of weight loss in the overall treatment effect. Conclusion This suggests nutrition-related lifestyle factors play a role in acne pathogenesis. However, these preliminary findings should be confirmed by similar studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.01.046

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All interventional trials included examined the effect of GI/glycemic load on acne.

    “All the interventional trials included examined the effect of GI/glycemic load on acne (Table IV).47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • The low-GI diet group experienced a significantly greater improvement in inflammatory and total lesion counts compared with the control-diet group (inflammatory: −16.0 vs −8.5, P = .04; total: −22.0 ± 3.5 vs −10.9 ± 2.9, P = .02).

    “Although both the groups experienced significant improvements in lesion count, the low-GI diet group experienced a significantly greater improvement compared with the control-diet group (inflammatory lesion counts: −16.0 with low GI vs −8.5 with control, P = .04; total lesion counts: −22.0 ± 3.5 with low GI vs −10.9 ± 2.9 with control, P = .02).47,48”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • In 2 articles, 43 male patients with acne, treated with a topical cleanser, were randomized to 12 weeks of either a low-GI diet (GI, 43) or a control diet (GI, 56).

    “In 2 articles, 43 male patients with acne, treated with a topical cleanser, were randomized to 12 weeks of either a low-GI diet (GI, 43) or a control diet (GI, 56).47,48”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

  • In one RCT, the low-glucose-load diet group had significantly decreased lesion counts (−59%) compared with the control-diet group (−38%) (P = .046).

    “In 1, the low-glucose-load diet group had significantly decreased lesion counts (−59%) compared with the control-diet group (−38%) (P = .046),48”

    From Diet and acne: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, R. N., Mann, N. J., Braue, A., Mäkeläinen, H., & Varigos, G. A.
Affiliations
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • University of Turku (FI)
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-08
Volume
57
Issue
2
Pages
247-256
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1965067356
Cited by
294
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
acne, high-protein diet, low glycemic load diet, dietary intervention, sex hormone-binding globulin, free androgen index, insulin-like growth factor I, IGFBP-1, acne lesion count, weight loss, acne pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review