Cited by 17Skin Protection and AgingMedia Influence and HealthMedia Studies and Communication

A profile of skin cancer prevention media coverage in 2009

Cokkinides, Vilma, Kirkland, Deborah, Andrews, Kimberly, Sullivan, Kristen, Lichtenfeld, J. Leonard·2012·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Little is known about the coverage of skin cancer prevention messages in news print media. Objective To perform a content analysis of mass-media articles from newspaper and magazines pertaining to skin cancer prevention in 4 specific months (January, May, July, and October) in 2009 and assess the extent of coverage of skin cancer prevention messages. Methods We conducted a content analysis of 144 articles related to skin cancer prevention extracted from strategic media scans of selected months in 2009. We sought to provide the frequency of mass-media content categorized by theme and focus related to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) protection and risk-reducing behaviors. Results The audience for the vast majority (78%) of the articles was the general public. Among the assessed articles, more were published in May (49%) and July (35%) than in the remaining other months. The two most frequent themes focused on 'protection of the skin' (32%) and on 'skin cancer prevention' (23%) via risk reduction behavioral practices. Analysis of message content regarding UVR reduction practices showed that many mentioned 'use of sunscreen' (65% of messages) with the least-often mentioned behaviors being 'seek shade' (6.3%) and 'do not burn' (1.4%). In addition, a quarter of the articles lacked any content mentioning recommended UVR reduction behaviors. Limitations This study was limited to the narrow scope of articles published in 2009 and for selected months. Conclusions This profile of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.11.920

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study of media coverage on skin cancer prevention found more content about sunscreen than other recommended prevention strategies.

    “Furthermore, a study of media coverage on skin cancer prevention found more content about sunscreen than other recommended prevention strategies.5”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cokkinides, V., Kirkland, D., Andrews, K., Sullivan, K., & Lichtenfeld, J. L.
Affiliations
American Cancer Society (US)
Corresponding author
Cokkinides, Vilma
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-10
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
570-575
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032011976
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (5U50DP001863-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
skin cancer prevention, media coverage, newspaper articles, magazine articles, UV protection, sunscreen use, risk-reducing behavior, health communication
MeSH terms
Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Mass Media, Newspapers as Topic, Periodicals as Topic, Skin Neoplasms, Sunscreening Agents, Ultraviolet Rays, Information Dissemination, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review