Cited by 14Skin Protection and AgingSmoking Behavior and CessationMedia, Gender, and Advertising

Sun Care Advertising in Popular U.S. Magazines

Lee, Eric T., O'Riordan, David, Swetter, Susan M., Demierre, Marie-France, Brooks, Katie, Geller, Alan C.·2006·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Purpose.: We assessed the placement of magazine advertising for sun care products to lay the groundwork for broader promotion to more diverse and high-risk demographic groups. Methods.: We reviewed 579 issues of 24 magazines published between the months of May and September from 1997 to 2002. We conducted a cover-to-cover review of top-selling magazines for men, women, teens, parents, travelers, and outdoor recreation users. We determined if there were any advertisements for the following sun care products: sun tanning lotions containing sun protection factor (SPF), sunless tanners without SPF, sunscreen with SPF, moisturizers with SPF, or cosmetics with SPF (which include sunless tanners containing SPF). Results.: Sun care products, including sunscreens, were advertised primarily in women's magazines (77%). Nearly two thirds of all sun care products advertised were either for cosmetics (38%) or moisturizers (26%) containing SPF, followed by ads for sunscreen sold as a stand-alone product (19%). None of the ads contained all of the recommendations for safe use of sunscreen: a minimum SPF of 15, both UVA and UVB protection, reapplication instructions, and an adequate application coverage of 2 milligrams per square centimeter. Discussion.: Magazine advertising to men, travelers, outdoor recreation users, and parents/ families (totaling a circulation of 41 million readers) during this six-year period were far fewer than those for women, despite high rates of excessive sun exposure in these groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/0890-1171-20.5.349

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Men may view sunscreen as non-masculine, messy, or inconvenient, and sunscreen ads target women more often than men.

    “Men may view sunscreen as non-masculine, messy, or inconvenient,22, 23 and sunscreen ads target women more often than men.24,25”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, E. T., O'Riordan, D., Swetter, S. M., Demierre, M.-F., Brooks, K., & Geller, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Eric T. Lee, MA, is a second-year medical student with the Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. David O'Riordan, PhD, is with the Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii. Susan M. Swetter, MD, is with the Dermatology Service, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California. Marie-France Demierre, MD; Katie Brooks, MPH; and Alan C. Geller, MPH, RN, are with the Department of Dermatology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
Corresponding author
Geller, Alan C.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2006-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
349-352
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2026514237
Cited by
14
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Media, Gender, and Advertising
Keywords
sunscreen, sunless tanning, sun protection factor, magazine advertising, gender differences in advertising
MeSH terms
Advertising, Cosmetics, Drug Industry, Drug Labeling, Female, Humans, Male, Periodicals as Topic, Sex Factors, Sunburn, Sunscreening Agents, Ultraviolet Rays, United States, Bibliometrics, Skin Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review