Cited by 110Pharmaceutical Quality and CounterfeitingMercury impact and mitigation studiesContact Dermatitis and Allergies

Spectrometric analysis of mercury content in 549 skin-lightening products: Is mercury toxicity a hidden global health hazard?

Hamann, Carsten R., Boonchai, Waranya, Wen, Liping, Sakanashi, Emi Nishijima, Chu, Chia-Yu, Hamann, Kylin, Hamann, Curtis P., Sinniah, Kumar +1 more·2014·Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Abstract

Background Cosmetic skin lightening is practiced worldwide. Mercury is a well-documented melanotoxin added to some lightening products. However, mercury can cause many dermatologic, renal, and neurologic problems. The Food and Drug Administration limits the amount of mercury in cosmetic products to trace amounts, 1 ppm. Objective The objective of this study was to quantitatively evaluate a large international sample of lightening products for mercury content, focusing on products available to US consumers either online or in stores. Methods A total of 549 skin-lightening products, manufactured in 32 countries, were purchased online in the United States, Taiwan, and Japan and in stores in the United States, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Japan, and Sri Lanka. Cosmetics were screened for mercury content above 200 ppm using a low-cost portable x-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Results Of the 549 tested products, 6.0% (n = 33) contained mercury above 1000 ppm. In all, 45% of mercury-containing samples contained mercury in excess of 10,000 ppm. Of lightening products purchased in the United States, 3.3% were found to contain mercury in excess of 1000 ppm. Limitations Our study did not evaluate creams for other melanosuppressive ingredients. Only 1 sample of each product was tested. Conclusion Our study confirms the national and global presence of mercury in skin-lightening products.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.09.050

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Hamann, C. R., Boonchai, W., Wen, L., Sakanashi, E. N., Chu, C.-Y., Hamann, K., Hamann, C. P., Sinniah, K., & Hamann, D.
Affiliations
  • Loma Linda University (US)
  • Siriraj Hospital (TH)
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
  • National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
  • Calvin University (US)
  • University of Arizona College of Medicine- Phoenix (US)
Corresponding author
Hamann, Carsten R.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
281-287.e3
ISSN
0190-9622 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113137963
Cited by
110
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
Keywords
mercury, skin whitening products, cosmetic safety, mercury toxicity, X-ray fluorescence
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, China, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Humans, Japan, Mercury, Mercury Poisoning, Ointments, Skin Absorption, Skin Pigmentation, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Global Health, Risk Assessment, Skin Lightening Preparations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review