Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review

Open access
Lewandowski, Witold M., Januszewicz, Katarzyna, Kosakowski, Wojciech·2019·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Abstract

This article discusses the current use of different pyrolytic reactors, their constructions and operating principles regarding the yields of main products of waste tyre pyrolytic recycling. Whether one makes a larger or smaller profit, or even a loss due to a surcharge being levied on waste tyre recycling, depends on the sale of the pyrolysis products (gas, char, oil), the proportions and market prices of which differ. The cheapest is gas, which can be used as a source of technological heat of energetically self-sufficient pyrolysis or after purification, can be burned in a boiler and converted into heat or electricity. Raw char is not expensive either. It requires upgrading and then, as carbon black, can be re-used for the production of tyres or in the form of improved carbon can be used as an absorber or catalyst. The most expensive is oil, containing mainly aromatic compounds, on the condition that it will not be burned as diesel or liquid fuel. Hence, the oil yields obtained in various types of pyrolysers are given. This review of pyrolysis reactors is organised according to the criterion of charge movement in the reactor and the means of bringing this about. Depending on the method and speed of movement of the load in reactors, they are classified as fixed-bed and movable-bed reactors. The latter group is subdivided, depending on the method of inducing this movement, into pneumatic (bubbling, spouted, circulating or transport fluidised beds), mechanical (rotary kiln, rake, auger, ablative, stirred) reactors and reactors in which the charge moves under gravity. This review focuses on the construction and operating principles of the reactors and the yields of the products of pyrolytic thermal decomposition of scrap tyres. The summary and comparison of main product yields (oil/gas/coal) obtained in different reactors and by different authors, presented in graphical and tabular form, constitute a summary and supplement to this work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.018

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Lewandowski, W. M., Januszewicz, K., & Kosakowski, W.
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
140
Pages
25-53
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2933204821
Cited by
282
References
108
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.018
The paper
Lewandowski, W. M., Januszewicz, K., & Kosakowski, W. (2019). Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.