The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review
Open accessAbstract
This article discusses the current use of different pyrolytic reactors, their constructions and operating principles regarding the yields of main products of waste tyre pyrolytic recycling. Whether one makes a larger or smaller profit, or even a loss due to a surcharge being levied on waste tyre recycling, depends on the sale of the pyrolysis products (gas, char, oil), the proportions and market prices of which differ. The cheapest is gas, which can be used as a source of technological heat of energetically self-sufficient pyrolysis or after purification, can be burned in a boiler and converted into heat or electricity. Raw char is not expensive either. It requires upgrading and then, as carbon black, can be re-used for the production of tyres or in the form of improved carbon can be used as an absorber or catalyst. The most expensive is oil, containing mainly aromatic compounds, on the condition that it will not be burned as diesel or liquid fuel. Hence, the oil yields obtained in various types of pyrolysers are given. This review of pyrolysis reactors is organised according to the criterion of charge movement in the reactor and the means of bringing this about. Depending on the method and speed of movement of the load in reactors, they are classified as fixed-bed and movable-bed reactors. The latter group is subdivided, depending on the method of inducing this movement, into pneumatic (bubbling, spouted, circulating or transport fluidised beds), mechanical (rotary kiln, rake, auger, ablative, stirred) reactors and reactors in which the charge moves under gravity. This review focuses on the construction and operating principles of the reactors and the yields of the products of pyrolytic thermal decomposition of scrap tyres. The summary and comparison of main product yields (oil/gas/coal) obtained in different reactors and by different authors, presented in graphical and tabular form, constitute a summary and supplement to this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product upgrading
Bridgwater, A. V. (2012) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.01.048 · Cited by 4,856
Biomass Gasification and Pyrolysis: Practical Design and Theory
Basu, P. (2010) · Cited by 1,332
International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics 2016 (ICRTP2016)
(2016) · Journal of Physics: Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001 · Cited by 822
Pyrolysis of waste tyres: A review
Williams, P. T. (2013) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.003 · Cited by 807
Catalysis for conversion of biomass to fuels via pyrolysis and gasification: A review
Bulushev, D. A., & Ross, J. R. H. (2011) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2011.02.005 · Cited by 615
Progress in used tyres management in the European Union: A review
Sienkiewicz, M., Kucinska-Lipka, J., Janik, H., & Balas, A. (2012) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.010 · Cited by 559
Catalytic co-pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass with polymers: a critical review
Zhang, X., Lei, H., Chen, S., & Wu, J. (2016) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c6gc00911e · Cited by 497
López, A., de Marco, I., Caballero, B. M., Laresgoiti, M. F., Adrados, A., & Aranzabal, A. (2011) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.03.030 · Cited by 479
A review of recent laboratory research and commercial developments in fast pyrolysis and upgrading
Butler, E., Devlin, G., Meier, D., & McDonnell, K. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.035 · Cited by 471
Malkow, T. (2004) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/s0956-053x(03)00038-2 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Al-Rumaihi, A., Shahbaz, M., Mckay, G., Mackey, H., & Al-Ansari, T. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112715 · Cited by 650
Pyrolysis of Waste Tires: A Review
Han, W., Han, D., & Chen, H. (2023) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym15071604 · Cited by 202
Tire pyrolysis char: Processes, properties, upgrading and applications
Gao, N., Wang, F., Quan, C., Santamaria, L., Lopez, G., & Williams, P. T. (2022) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101022 · Cited by 188
Impact of heating rates on the evolution of function groups of the biochar from lignin pyrolysis
Li, C., Hayashi, J.-I., Sun, Y., Zhang, L., Zhang, S., Wang, S., & Hu, X. (2021) · Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis · doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105031 · Cited by 143
Shyam, S., Arun, J., Gopinath, K. P., Ribhu, G., Ashish, M., & Ajay, S. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131490 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewandowski, W. M., Januszewicz, K., & Kosakowski, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-06
- Volume
- 140
- Pages
- 25-53
- ISSN
- 0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2933204821
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.018
- The paper
- Lewandowski, W. M., Januszewicz, K., & Kosakowski, W. (2019). Efficiency and proportions of waste tyre pyrolysis products depending on the reactor type—A review. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.